The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of Miscanthus giganteus Lignin Isolated by Ethanol Organosolv Process under Reflux Condition
Abstract
Miscanthus giganteus lignin was extracted by an organosolv process under reflux conditions (4 h) with varying concentrations of ethanol (65%, 75%, 85%, 95%) and 0.2 M hydrochloric acid as catalyst. The resulting lignin was extensively characterized by size exclusion chromatography (SEC), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS), two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (2D-NMR), and chemical analysis (residual sugars, Klason lignin, ash). The predominant linkage units present were β-O-4' (82-84%), resinol (6-7%), and phenylcoumaran (10-11%). The 65% ethanol solvent system gave the lowest lignin yield (14% of starting biomass) compared to 29-32% of the other systems. Increasing ethanol concentration resulted in decreasing carbohydrate content of the lignins (3.6-1.1%), a higher solubility in tetrahydrofuran (THF), a slight reduction of the molecular weight (M(w) 2.72-2.25 KDa), an increasing α-ethoxylation, and an increase in ethoxylated phenylpropenoic compounds (p-coumaric and ferulic acid), but the S/G ratio of the monolignols (0.63, GC/MS) and Klason lignin content (86-88%) were unaffected. An extraction method for these ethyl-esterified phenylpropenoids and smaller molecular weight lignin compounds was developed. The effect of reaction time (2, 4, and 8 h) was investigated for the 95% ethanol solvent system. Besides increased lignin yield (13-43%), a slight increase in M(w) (2.21-2.38 kDa) and S/G ratio (0.53-0.68, GC-MS) was observed. Consecutive extractions suggested that these changes were not from lignin modifications (e.g., condensations) but rather from extraction of lignin of different composition. The results were compared to similar solvent systems with 95% acetone and 95% dioxane.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Constant, S., Wienk, H. L. J., Frissen, A. E., Peinder, P. D., Boelens, R., van Es, D. S., Grisel, R. J. H., Weckhuysen, B. M., Huijgen, W. J. J., Gosselink, R. J. A., et al. (2016) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c5gc03043a · Cited by 893
Characterization and analysis of the molecular weight of lignin for biorefining studies
Tolbert, A., Akinosho, H., Khunsupat, R., Naskar, A. K., & Ragauskas, A. J. (2014) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1500 · Cited by 504
Van den Bosch, S., Renders, T., Kennis, S., Koelewijn, S.-F., Van den Bossche, G., Vangeel, T., Deneyer, A., Depuydt, D., Courtin, C. M., Thevelein, J. M., et al. (2017) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c7gc01324h · Cited by 346
Cheng, X.-C., Guo, X.-R., Qin, Z., Wang, X.-D., Liu, H.-M., & Liu, Y.-L. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.249 · Cited by 71
Lignin from bark as a resource for aromatics production by hydrothermal liquefaction
Schuler, J., Hornung, U., Dahmen, N., & Sauer, J. (2019) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12562 · Cited by 39
Yang, L., Zheng, T., Huang, C., & Yao, J. (2022) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.066 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauer, S., Sorek, H., Mitchell, V. D., Ibáñez, A. B., & Wemmer, D. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-08-10
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 8203-8212
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2031509896
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.