CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30Plant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Postharvest Application of Organic and Inorganic Salts To Control Potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) Storage Soft Rot: Plant Tissue–Salt Physicochemical Interactions

Yaganza, E. S., Tweddell, R. J., Arul, J.·2014·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
DOI 10.1021/jf5017863
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Soft rot caused by Pectobacterium sp. is a devastating disease affecting stored potato tubers, and there is a lack of effective means of controlling this disease. In this study, 21 organic and inorganic salts were tested for their ability to control soft rot in potato tubers. In the preventive treatment, significant control of soft rot was observed with AlCl3 (≥66%) and Na2S2O3 (≥57%) and to a lesser extent with Al lactate and Na benzoate (≥34%) and K sorbate and Na propionate (≥27%). However, only a moderate control was achieved by curative treatment with AlCl3 and Na2S2O3 (42%) and sodium benzoate (≥33%). Overall, the in vitro inhibitory activity of salts was attenuated in the presence of plant tissue (in vivo) to different degrees. The inhibitory action of the salts in the preventive treatment, whether effective or otherwise, showed an inverse linear relationship with water ionization capacity (pK') of the salt ions, whereas in the curative treatment, only the effective salts showed this inverse linear relationship. Salt-plant tissue interactions appear to play a central role in the attenuated inhibitory activity of salts in potato tuber through reduction in the availability of the inhibitory ions for salt-bacteria interactions. This study demonstrates that AlCl3, Na2S2O3, and Na benzoate have potential in controlling potato tuber soft rot and provides a general basis for understanding of specific salt-tissue interactions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf5017863

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Sharga B. M., 1998, Can. J. Microbiol., 44, 777, 10.1139/w98-064 · DOI
  2. Czajkowski R., 2011, Pathology, 60, 999
  3. Gardan L., 2003, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 53, 381, 10.1099/ijs.0.02423-0 · DOI
  4. Hauben L., 1998, Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 21, 384, 10.1016/S0723-2020(98)80048-9 · DOI
  5. Mills A. A. S., 2006, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 41, 208, 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.03.015 · DOI
  6. Horst R. K., 1992, Plant Dis., 76, 247, 10.1094/PD-76-0247 · DOI
  7. Ziv O., 1992, Plant Dis., 76, 513, 10.1094/PD-76-0513 · DOI
  8. Aharoni Y., 1997, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 10, 201, 10.1016/S0925-5214(97)01412-9 · DOI
  9. Fallik E., 1997, J. Hortic. Sci., 72, 35
  10. Smilanick J. L., 1999, Plant Dis., 83, 139, 10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.2.139 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Olivier C., 1999, Plant Dis., 83, 814, 10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.9.814 · DOI
  12. Olivier C., 1998, Plant Dis., 82, 213, 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.2.213 · DOI
  13. Hervieux V., 2002, Plant Dis., 86, 1014, 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.9.1014 · DOI
  14. Punja Z. K., 1993, Plant Dis., 77, 989, 10.1094/PD-77-0989 · DOI
  15. Mecteau M. R., 2008, Phytoprotection, 89, 1, 10.7202/000377ar · DOI
  16. Mecteau M. R., 2002, Mycol. Res., 106, 688, 10.1017/S0953756202005944 · DOI
  17. Yaganza E. S., 2001, Phytopathology, 91, S198
  18. Jeandet P., 2000, Acta Hortic., 528, 591, 10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.528.88 · DOI
  19. Sholberg P. L., 1998, Plant Dis., 82, 689, 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.6.689 · DOI
  20. Sholberg P. L., 1995, HortScience, 30, 1271, 10.21273/HORTSCI.30.6.1271 · DOI
  21. Sholberg P. L., 1996, Plant Dis., 80, 1425, 10.1094/PD-80-1425 · DOI
  22. Yaganza E. S., 2004, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 70, 6800, 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6800-6808.2004 · DOI
  23. Avis T. J., 2009, Phytopathology, 99, 167, 10.1094/PHYTO-99-2-0167 · DOI
  24. Avis T. J., 2007, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 73, 2820, 10.1128/AEM.02849-06 · DOI
  25. Welch D. F., 1991, Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 4, 422, 10.1128/CMR.4.4.422 · DOI
  26. Yaganza E. S., 2009, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 75, 1465, 10.1128/AEM.02447-08 · DOI
  27. Rousselle-Bourgeois F., 1995, Potato Res., 38, 111, 10.1007/BF02358077 · DOI
  28. Ranganna B., 1997, Can. J. Plant Pathol., 19, 30, 10.1080/07060669709500568 · DOI
  29. Rengel Z., 1996, New Phytol., 134, 389, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04356.x · DOI
  30. Bergethon, P. R.; Simons, E. R.Biophysical Chemistry: Molecules to Membranes;Springer-Verlag:New York, 1990; pp285–288. · DOI
  31. Crasnier M., 1985, Eur. J. Biochem., 151, 187, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb09084.x · DOI
  32. Noat G., 1980, Plant Cell Environ., 3, 225, 10.1111/1365-3040.ep11581782 · DOI
  33. Ricard J., 1981, Biochem. J., 195, 357, 10.1042/bj1950357 · DOI
  34. Barras F., 1994, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 32, 201, 10.1146/annurev.py.32.090194.001221 · DOI
  35. Nasuno S., 1966, J. Biol. Chem., 241, 5298, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)96430-6 · DOI
  36. Rengel Z., 1992, New Phytol., 121, 499, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01120.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Yaganza, E. S., Tweddell, R. J., & Arul, J.
Affiliations
Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Arul, J.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2014-09-15
Volume
62
Issue
38
Pages
9223-9231
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
DOI
10.1021/jf5017863
OpenAlex
W2332061955
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conseil de Recherche en Agriculture, Pêche et Alimentation du Québec
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Keywords
Pectobacterium, postharvest disease control, organic salts, inorganic salts, aluminum chloride, sodium metabisulfite, sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, sodium propionate, prophylaxis, curative treatment, tuber storage
MeSH terms
Food Preservation, Food Preservatives, Solanum tuberosum, Salts, Plant Tubers, Pectobacterium, Food Storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review