The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DFRC Method for Lignin Analysis. 1. New Method for β-Aryl Ether Cleavage: Lignin Model Studies
Abstract
A new method for selective and efficient cleavage of arylglycerol-β-aryl (β-O-4) ether linkages in lignins is described and applied to several lignin β-ether models. The term “DFRC” was coined for derivatization followed by reductive cleavage. Derivatization, accompanied by cell wall solubilization, is accomplished with acetyl bromide (AcBr); reductive cleavage of resulting β-bromo ethers utilizes zinc in acetic acid. Degradation monomers, 4-acetoxycinnamyl acetates, from β-ether cleavage by the DFRC method were identified by NMR, GC−MS, and comparison of GC retention times with authentic compounds. Under the conditions used in this study, the β-ether linkage of all models was cleaved in very high (>92%) yield. The DFRC method produces simpler mixtures of monomers with higher yields than alternative hydrolytic methods. Because of its relative simplicity, mild conditions, and exceptional selectivity, this method should become a powerful analytical method for lignin characterization. Keywords: Acetyl bromide; lignin; lignin model compound; β-aryl ether; thioacidolysis; β-bromoether; cleavage; quantitative analysis; gas chromatography; reductive elimination; acetylation; bromination
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ralph, J., & Helm, R. F. (1993) · ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Books · doi:10.2134/1993.foragecellwall.c9 · Cited by 64
Self-citation
Cited by
Strategies for the Conversion of Lignin to High-Value Polymeric Materials: Review and Perspective
Upton, B. M., & Kasko, A. M. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00345 · Cited by 1,519
Guidelines for performing lignin-first biorefining
Abu-Omar, M. M., Barta, K., Beckham, G. T., Luterbacher, J. S., Ralph, J., Rinaldi, R., Román-Leshkov, Y., Samec, J. S. M., Sels, B. F., & Wang, F. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee02870c · Cited by 913
Self-citationdel Río, J. C., Rencoret, J., Prinsen, P., Martínez, Á. T., Ralph, J., & Gutiérrez, A. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf301002n · Cited by 835
Self-citationA review on lignin-based polymeric, micro- and nano-structured materials
Duval, A., & Lawoko, M. (2014) · Reactive and Functional Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.017 · Cited by 733
Whole plant cell wall characterization using solution-state 2D NMR
Mansfield, S. D., Kim, H., Lu, F., & Ralph, J. (2012) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.064 · Cited by 720
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, F., & Ralph, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-12-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4655-4660
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1990429795
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.