The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Drug Binding Affinities by Comparative Binding Energy Analysis
Abstract
A new computational method for deducing quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) using structural data from ligand-macromolecule complexes is presented. First, the ligand-macromolecule interaction energy is computed for a set of ligands using molecular mechanics calculations. Then, by selecting and scaling components of the ligand-macromolecule interaction energy that show good predictive ability, a regression equation is obtained in which activity is correlated with the interaction energies of parts of the ligands and key regions of the macromolecule. Application to the interaction of the human synovial fluid phospholipase A2 with 26 inhibitors indicates that the derived QSAR has good predictive ability and provides insight into the mechanism of enzyme inhibition. The method, which we term comparative binding energy (COMBINE) analysis, is expected to be applicable to ligand-receptor interactions in a range of contexts including rational drug design, host-guest systems, and protein engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wold, S., Ruhe, A., Wold, H., & Dunn, III (1984) · SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing · doi:10.1137/0905052 · Cited by 2,529
Cited by
QSAR Modeling: Where have you been? Where are you going to?
Cherkasov, A., Muratov, E. N., Fourches, D., Varnek, A., Baskin, I. I., Cronin, M., Dearden, J., Gramatica, P., Martin, Y. C., Todeschini, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm4004285 · Cited by 2,164
Cang, Z., & Wei, G.-W. (2017) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005690 · Cited by 330
Cang, Z., & Wei, G. (2018) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cnm.2914 · Cited by 172
Nguyen, D. D., Cang, Z., Wu, K., Wang, M., Cao, Y., & Wei, G.-W. (2019) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-018-0146-6 · Cited by 155
Lapinsh, M., Prusis, P., Gutcaits, A., Lundstedt, T., & Wikberg, J. E. S. (2001) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/s0304-4165(00)00187-2 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Ortiz, A. R., Pisabarro, M. T., Gago, F., & Wade, R. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2681-2691
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2017043087
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Drug Binding Affinities by Comparative Binding Energy Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm00014a020
- The paper
- Ortiz, A. R., Pisabarro, M. T., Gago, F., & Wade, R. C. (1995). Prediction of Drug Binding Affinities by Comparative Binding Energy Analysis. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00014a020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.