The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chance factors in studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships
Abstract
Multiple regression analysis is a basic statistical tool used for QSAR studies in drug design. However, there is a risk or arriving at fortuitous correlations when too many variables are screened relative to the number of available observations. In this regard, a critical distinction must be made between the number of variables screened for possible correlation and the number which actually appear in the regression equation. Using a modified Fortran stepwise multiple-regression analysis program, simulated QSAR studies employing random numbers were run for many different combinations of screened variables and observations. Under certain conditions, a substantial incidence of correlations with high r2 values were found, although the overall degree of chance correlation noted was less than that reported in a previous study. Analysis of the results has provided a basis for making judgements concerning the level of risk of encountering chance correlations for a wide range of combinations of observations and screened variables in QSAR studies using multiple-regression analysis. For illustrative purposes, some examples involving published QSAR studies have been considered and the reported correlations shown to be less significant than originally presented through the influence of unrecognized chance factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
QSAR Modeling: Where have you been? Where are you going to?
Cherkasov, A., Muratov, E. N., Fourches, D., Varnek, A., Baskin, I. I., Cronin, M., Dearden, J., Gramatica, P., Martin, Y. C., Todeschini, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm4004285 · Cited by 2,164
Eriksson, L., Jaworska, J., Worth, A. P., Cronin, M. T. D., McDowell, R. M., & Gramatica, P. (2003) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.5758 · Cited by 1,325
Cramer, R. D., Bunce, J. D., Patterson, D. E., & Frank, I. E. (1988) · Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships · doi:10.1002/qsar.19880070105 · Cited by 833
How not to develop a quantitative structure–activity or structure–property relationship (QSAR/QSPR)
Dearden, J. C., Cronin, M. T. D., & Kaiser, K. L. E. (2009) · SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research · doi:10.1080/10629360902949567 · Cited by 468
Baroni, M., Costantino, G., Cruciani, G., Riganelli, D., Valigi, R., & Clementi, S. (1993) · Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships · doi:10.1002/qsar.19930120103 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Topliss, J. G., & Edwards, R. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1979-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1238-1244
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2152121191
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chance factors in studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm00196a017
- The paper
- Topliss, J. G., & Edwards, R. P. (1979). Chance factors in studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00196a017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.