The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ElogDoct: A Tool for Lipophilicity Determination in Drug Discovery. 2. Basic and Neutral Compounds
Abstract
We present an RP-HPLC method for the determination of the octanol-water distribution coefficients at pH 7.4, as log values, for neutral and basic drugs, which combines ease of operation with high accuracy. The method is shown to work for a training set of 90 molecules comprised largely of drugs, and it was also applied to a test set of 10 proprietary compounds. This work expands the applicability of the method presented in our earlier report, for the determination of logP(oct) for neutral compounds (J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2922-2928), and it offers the same general features but widens the scope. Generally, the method (i) is compound sparing (< or =1 mL of a 50-100 microg/mL solution needed), (ii) is insensitive to concentration and phase ratio effects observed in some shake-flask determinations, (iii) is amenable to rapid determinations (< or = 20 min on average), (iv) is insensitive to impurities, (v) possesses a wide lipophilicity range (>7 log units), and (vi) offers a good accuracy, (vii) an excellent reproducibility, (viii) and an excellent potential for automation. To the best of our knowledge, a similar performance, on a set of noncongeneric drugs, has not been previously reported. We refer to the value generated via this method as ElogD(oct).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Determination of sets of solute descriptors from chromatographic measurements
Abraham, M. H., Ibrahim, A., & Zissimos, A. M. (2004) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2003.12.004 · Cited by 891
Stepan, A. F., Subramanyam, C., Efremov, I. V., Dutra, J. K., O’Sullivan, T. J., DiRico, K. J., McDonald, W. S., Won, A., Dorff, P. H., Nolan, C. E., et al. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm300094u · Cited by 468
Separation methods for estimating octanol–water partition coefficients
Poole, S. K., & Poole, C. F. (2003) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2003.08.032 · Cited by 253
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor
Griffith, D. A., Edmonds, D. J., Fortin, J.-P., Kalgutkar, A. S., Kuzmiski, J. B., Loria, P. M., Saxena, A. R., Bagley, S. W., Buckeridge, C., Curto, J. M., et al. (2022) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01856 · Cited by 192
Open Source Bayesian Models. 1. Application to ADME/Tox and Drug Discovery Datasets
Clark, A. M., Dole, K., Coulon-Spektor, A., McNutt, A., Grass, G., Freundlich, J. S., Reynolds, R. C., & Ekins, S. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00143 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Lombardo, F., Shalaeva, M. Y., Tupper, K. A., & Gao, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-06-26
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2490-2497
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W4230962467
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ElogDoct: A Tool for Lipophilicity Determination in Drug Discovery. 2. Basic and Neutral Compounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm0100990
- The paper
- Lombardo, F., Shalaeva, M. Y., Tupper, K. A., & Gao, F. (2001). ElogDoct: A Tool for Lipophilicity Determination in Drug Discovery. 2. Basic and Neutral Compounds. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0100990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.