The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Redox-Active Antineoplastic Ruthenium Complexes with Indazole: Correlation of in Vitro Potency and Reduction Potential
Abstract
Antineoplastic ruthenium(III) complexes are generally regarded as prodrugs, being activated by reduction. Within a homologous series of ruthenium(III) complexes, cytotoxic potency is therefore expected to increase with increasing ease of reduction. Complexes of the general formula [Ru(III)Cl((6-n))(ind)n](3-n)- (n = 0-4; ind = indazole; counterions = Hind(+) or Cl(-)) and the compound trans-[Ru(II)Cl(2)(ind)(4)] have been prepared and characterized electrochemically. Lever's parametrization method predicts that a higher indazole-to-chloride ratio results in a higher reduction potential, which is confirmed by cyclic voltammetry. In vitro antitumor potencies of these complexes in colon cancer cells (SW480) and ovarian cancer cells (CH1) vary by more than 2 orders of magnitude and increase in the following rank order: [Ru(III)Cl(6)](3-) < [Ru(III)Cl(4)(ind)(2)](-) < [Ru(III)Cl(5)(ind)](2-) << [Ru(III)Cl(3)(ind)(3)] < [Ru(III)Cl(2)(ind)(4)](+) approximately [Ru(II)Cl(2)(ind)(4)]. Thus, the observed differences in potency correlate with reduction potentials largely, though not perfectly, pointing to the influence of additional factors. Differences in the cellular uptake (probably resulting from different lipophilicity) contribute to this correlation but cannot solely account for it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tumor Hypoxia: Definitions and Current Clinical, Biologic, and Molecular Aspects
Hockel, M., & Vaupel, P. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.4.266 · Cited by 2,662
Cited by
Hartinger, C. G., Zorbas-Seifried, S., Jakupec, M. A., Kynast, B., Zorbas, H., & Keppler, B. K. (2006) · Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2006.02.013 · Cited by 956
Self-citationAntitumour metal compounds: more than theme and variations
Jakupec, M. A., Galanski, M. S., Arion, V. B., Hartinger, C. G., & Keppler, B. K. (2008) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/b712656p · Cited by 850
Self-citationHartinger, C. G., Jakupec, M. A., Zorbas‐Seifried, S., Groessl, M., Egger, A., Berger, W., Zorbas, H., Dyson, P. J., & Keppler, B. K. (2008) · Chemistry & Biodiversity · doi:10.1002/cbdv.200890195 · Cited by 830
Self-citationNKP-1339, the first ruthenium-based anticancer drug on the edge to clinical application
Trondl, R., Heffeter, P., Kowol, C. R., Jakupec, M. A., Berger, W., & Keppler, B. K. (2014) · Chem. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3sc53243g · Cited by 675
Self-citationAnticancer Activity of Metal Complexes: Involvement of Redox Processes
Jungwirth, U., Kowol, C. R., Keppler, B. K., Hartinger, C. G., Berger, W., & Heffeter, P. (2011) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2010.3663 · Cited by 554
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jakupec, M. A., Reisner, E., Eichinger, A., Pongratz, M., Arion, V. B., Galanski, M. S., Hartinger, C. G., & Keppler, B. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-03-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2831-2837
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2064586647
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.