The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time-Related Differences in the Physical Property Profiles of Oral Drugs
Abstract
Comparisons of the calculated physicochemical properties of oral drugs launched prior to 1983 (864 drugs) and between 1983 and 2002 (329 drugs) show that mean values of lipophilicity, percent polar surface area and H-bond donor count are the same, suggesting that these are the most important oral druglike physical properties. In contrast, mean values of molecular weight and the numbers of O + N atoms, H-bond acceptors, and rotatable bonds and rings have increased in 1983-2002 drugs (by 13-29%). Analysis of the 1983-2002 oral drugs by therapy area shows that antiinfectives and nervous system drugs have the most extreme physical property profiles. Cardiovascular drugs show increasing molecular weight with year of publication, primarily a consequence of focusing on clinically proven mechanisms, with limited chemical diversity. Drug classes other than antiinfectives show comparable distributions of lipophilicity, suggesting that this property in oral drugs is important irrespective of the drug's target. The results suggest that the balance between polar and nonpolar drug properties is an important, unchanging feature of oral drug molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates
Veber, D. F., Johnson, S. R., Cheng, H.-Y., Smith, B. R., Ward, K. W., & Kopple, K. D. (2002) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm020017n · Cited by 8,420
Drug research: myths, hype and reality
Kubinyi, H. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1156 · Cited by 348
Cited by
The influence of drug-like concepts on decision-making in medicinal chemistry
Leeson, P. D., & Springthorpe, B. (2007) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2445 · Cited by 2,403
Self-citationMedicinal chemical properties of successful central nervous system drugs
Pajouhesh, H., & Lenz, G. R. (2005) · NeuroRX · doi:10.1602/neurorx.2.4.541 · Cited by 1,535
The role of ligand efficiency metrics in drug discovery
Hopkins, A. L., Keserü, G. M., Leeson, P. D., Rees, D. C., & Reynolds, C. H. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4163 · Cited by 1,181
Self-citationLipophilicity in drug discovery
Waring, M. J. (2010) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460441003605098 · Cited by 873
Bioisosteres of the Phenyl Ring: Recent Strategic Applications in Lead Optimization and Drug Design
Subbaiah, M. A. M., & Meanwell, N. A. (2021) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01215 · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Leeson, P. D., & Davis, A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-11-02
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 6338-6348
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2002352450
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.