The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the Molecular Mechanics Poisson−Boltzmann Surface Area Free Energy Method Using a Congeneric Series of Ligands to p38 MAP Kinase
Abstract
The recently described molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) method for calculating free energies is applied to a congeneric series of 16 ligands to p38 MAP kinase whose binding constants span approximately 2 orders of magnitude. These compounds have previously been used to test and compare other free energy calculation methods, including thermodynamic integration (TI), OWFEG, ChemScore, PLPScore, and Dock Energy Score. We find that the MM-PBSA performs relatively poorly for this set of ligands, yielding results much inferior to those from TI or OWFEG, inferior to Dock Energy Score, and not appreciably better than ChemScore or PLPScore but at an appreciably larger computational cost than any of these other methods. This suggests that one should be selective in applying the MM-PBSA method and that for systems that are amenable to other free energy approaches, these other approaches may be preferred. We also examine the single simulation approximation for MM-PBSA, whereby the required ligand and protein trajectories are extracted from a single MD simulation rather than two separate MD runs. This assumption, sometimes used to speed the MM-PBSA calculation, is found to yield significantly inferior results with only a moderate net percentage reduction in total simulation time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978
Charifson, P. S., Corkery, J. J., Murcko, M. A., & Walters, W. P. (1999) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm990352k · Cited by 698
Cited by
Hou, T., Wang, J., Li, Y., & Wang, W. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100275a · Cited by 2,773
Lyne, P. D., Lamb, M. L., & Saeh, J. C. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm060522a · Cited by 699
Huang, S.-Y., Grinter, S. Z., & Zou, X. (2010) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c0cp00151a · Cited by 508
Predicting Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energies to a Simple Model Site
Mobley, D. L., Graves, A. P., Chodera, J. D., McReynolds, A. C., Shoichet, B. K., & Dill, K. A. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.002 · Cited by 310
Hazardous Shortcuts in Standard Binding Free Energy Calculations
Blazhynska, M., Goulard Coderc de Lacam, E., Chen, H., Roux, B., & Chipot, C. (2022) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01490 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearlman, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-11-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 7796-7807
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W1995807192
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.