Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Physicochemical Challenges of Designing Multiple Ligands

Morphy, Richard, Rankovic, Zoran·2006·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

Compounds designed to bind more than one target can provide a therapeutic benefit relative to highly target-selective ligands. The physicochemical properties of designed multiple ligands were found to be less druglike than those for preclinical compounds in general. These properties are controlled by the superfamily to which the targets belong and the lead discovery strategy that was followed. The properties for peptide G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands were the least favorable for oral delivery, whereas transporter, monoamine GPCR, and oxidase ligands were the most druglike. The lead discovery strategy, framework combination or screening, exerts a profound influence on the property values. Combining the frameworks from two selective ligands often results in large, complex dual ligands, but druglike ligands can be achieved if the degree of framework overlap is maximized and the size of the selective ligands minimized. For some target combinations, a screening approach may provide a route to smaller, less complex leads.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jm0603015

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Morphy, R., & Rankovic, Z.
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2006-07-15
Volume
49
Issue
16
Pages
4961-4970
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W2074593965
Cited by
194
References
0
FWCI
10.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Physicochemical Challenges of Designing Multiple Ligands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm0603015
The paper
Morphy, R., & Rankovic, Z. (2006). The Physicochemical Challenges of Designing Multiple Ligands. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0603015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.