The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ligand Affinities Predicted with the MM/PBSA Method: Dependence on the Simulation Method and the Force Field
Open accessAbstract
The free energy of binding between avidin and seven biotin analogues has been calculated with the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) method. We have studied how the force field and the method to generate geometries affect the calculated binding free energies. Four different force fields were compared, but we saw no significant difference in the results. However, mixing the force fields used for the geometry generation and energy calculations is not recommended. In the molecular dynamics simulations, explicit water molecules must be used, but the size of the simulated system and the boundary conditions are less important. In fact, nonperiodic simulations with a fixed protein outside a relatively small simulated system (18 A) seem to be a proper approach. The mean absolute error was 9-19 kJ/mol, with a standard error of 5-15 kJ/mol, which arises mainly from the entropy term.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978
Hermann, R. B. (1972) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100663a023 · Cited by 700
Cited by
g_mmpbsa—A GROMACS Tool for High-Throughput MM-PBSA Calculations
Kumari, R., Kumar, R., Open Source Drug Discovery Consortium, & Lynn, A. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500020m · Cited by 4,882
Hou, T., Wang, J., Li, Y., & Wang, W. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100275a · Cited by 2,773
Wang, Z., Sun, H., Yao, X., Li, D., Xu, L., Li, Y., Tian, S., & Hou, T. (2016) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c6cp01555g · Cited by 946
Sun, H., Li, Y., Tian, S., Xu, L., & Hou, T. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp01388c · Cited by 738
Predicting the Impact of Missense Mutations on Protein–Protein Binding Affinity
Li, M., Petukh, M., Alexov, E., & Panchenko, A. R. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct401022c · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Weis, A., Katebzadeh, K., Söderhjelm, P., Nilsson, I., & Ryde, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-10-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 6596-6606
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2004676220
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ligand Affinities Predicted with the MM/PBSA Method: Dependence on the Simulation Method and the Force Field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm0608210
- The paper
- Weis, A., Katebzadeh, K., Söderhjelm, P., Nilsson, I., & Ryde, U. (2006). Ligand Affinities Predicted with the MM/PBSA Method: Dependence on the Simulation Method and the Force Field. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0608210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.