The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Protein−Ligand Interactions. Docking and Scoring: Successes and Gaps
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPerspectiveNEXTPrediction of Protein−Ligand Interactions. Docking and Scoring: Successes and GapsAndrew R. Leach, Brian K. Shoichet, and Catherine E. PeishoffView Author Information GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 2NY, U.K., and Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of CaliforniaSan Francisco, QB3 Building, 1700 4th Street, Box 2550, San Francisco, California 94148 Cite this: J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 20, 5851–5855Publication Date (Web):September 28, 2006Publication History Received18 August 2006Published online28 September 2006Published inissue 1 October 2006https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jm060999mhttps://doi.org/10.1021/jm060999mreview-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2006 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views6159Altmetric-Citations533LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Algorithms,Chemical structure,Ligands,Molecules,Screening assays Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Binding MOAD (Mother Of All Databases)
Hu, L., Benson, M. L., Smith, R. D., Lerner, M. G., & Carlson, H. A. (2005) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20512 · Cited by 328
Cited by
AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility
Morris, G. M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M. F., Belew, R. K., Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (2009) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21256 · Cited by 25,486
Ballester, P. J., & Mitchell, J. B. O. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq112 · Cited by 989
Wang, Z., Sun, H., Yao, X., Li, D., Xu, L., Li, Y., Tian, S., & Hou, T. (2016) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c6cp01555g · Cited by 946
Computer-aided drug discovery and development (CADDD): in silico-chemico-biological approach
Kapetanovic, I. M. (2008) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2006.12.006 · Cited by 662
Efficient Drug Lead Discovery and Optimization
Jorgensen, W. L. (2009) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar800236t · Cited by 649
Metadata
- Authors
- Leach, A. R., Shoichet, B. K., & Peishoff, C. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-09-28
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 5851-5855
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2949504121
- Cited by
- 646
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Protein−Ligand Interactions. Docking and Scoring: Successes and Gaps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm060999m
- The paper
- Leach, A. R., Shoichet, B. K., & Peishoff, C. E. (2006). Prediction of Protein−Ligand Interactions. Docking and Scoring: Successes and Gaps. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm060999m
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
