Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ligand Binding Efficiency: Trends, Physical Basis, and Implications

Reynolds, Charles H., Tounge, Brett A., Bembenek, Scott D.·2008·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

Ligand efficiency (i.e., potency/size) has emerged as an important metric in drug discovery. In general, smaller, more efficient ligands are believed to have improved prospects for good drug properties (e.g., bioavailability). Our analysis of thousands of ligands across a variety of targets shows that ligand efficiency is dependent on ligand size with smaller ligands having greater efficiencies, on average, than larger ligands. We propose two primary causes for this size dependence: the inevitable reduction in the quality of fit between ligand and receptor as the ligand becomes larger and more complex and the reduction in accessible ligand surface area on a per atom basis as size increases. These results have far-ranging implications for analysis of high-throughput screening hits, fragment-based approaches to drug discovery, and even computational models of potency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jm701255b

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Reynolds, C. H., Tounge, B. A., & Bembenek, S. D.
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2008-04-01
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
2432-2438
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W2041767096
Cited by
319
References
0
FWCI
37.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ligand Binding Efficiency: Trends, Physical Basis, and Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm701255b
The paper
Reynolds, C. H., Tounge, B. A., & Bembenek, S. D. (2008). Ligand Binding Efficiency: Trends, Physical Basis, and Implications. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm701255b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.