The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive Mechanistic Analysis of Hits from High-Throughput and Docking Screens against β-Lactamase
Open accessAbstract
High-throughput screening (HTS) is widely used in drug discovery. Especially for screens of unbiased libraries, false positives can dominate "hit lists"; their origins are much debated. Here we determine the mechanism of every active hit from a screen of 70,563 unbiased molecules against beta-lactamase using quantitative HTS (qHTS). Of the 1,274 initial inhibitors, 95% were detergent-sensitive and were classified as aggregators. Among the 70 remaining were 25 potent, covalent-acting beta-lactams. Mass spectra, counter-screens, and crystallography identified 12 as promiscuous covalent inhibitors. The remaining 33 were either aggregators or irreproducible. No specific reversible inhibitors were found. We turned to molecular docking to prioritize molecules from the same library for testing at higher concentrations. Of 16 tested, 2 were modest inhibitors. Subsequent X-ray structures corresponded to the docking prediction. Analog synthesis improved affinity to 8 microM. These results suggest that it may be the physical behavior of organic molecules, not their reactivity, that accounts for most screening artifacts. Structure-based methods may prioritize weak-but-novel chemotypes in unbiased library screens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening
Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci049714+ · Cited by 4,058
Self-citationDrugs for bad bugs: confronting the challenges of antibacterial discovery
Payne, D. J., Gwynn, M. N., Holmes, D. J., & Pompliano, D. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2201 · Cited by 2,512
Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.
Huang, N., Shoichet, B. K., & Irwin, J. J. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0608356 · Cited by 1,318
Self-citationTethering: Fragment-Based Drug Discovery
Erlanson, D. A., Wells, J. A., & Braisted, A. C. (2004) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.33.110502.140409 · Cited by 385
Cited by
Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking.
Mysinger, M. M., Carchia, M., Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm300687e · Cited by 2,412
Ultra-large library docking for discovering new chemotypes
Lyu, J., Wang, S., Balius, T. E., Singh, I., Levit, A., Moroz, Y. S., O’Meara, M. J., Che, T., Algaa, E., Tolmachova, K., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0917-9 · Cited by 998
Self-citationA practical guide to large-scale docking
Bender, B. J., Gahbauer, S., Luttens, A., Lyu, J., Webb, C. M., Stein, R. M., Fink, E. A., Balius, T. E., Carlsson, J., Irwin, J. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-021-00597-z · Cited by 546
Self-citationStructure-based drug screening for G-protein-coupled receptors
Shoichet, B. K., & Kobilka, B. K. (2012) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2012.03.007 · Cited by 294
Self-citationDivergent modes of enzyme inhibition in a homologous structure-activity series.
Ferreira, R. S., Bryant, C., Ang, K. K. H., McKerrow, J. H., Shoichet, B. K., & Renslo, A. R. (2009) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm9009229 · Cited by 88
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Babaoglu, K., Simeonov, A., Irwin, J. J., Nelson, M. E., Feng, B., Thomas, C. J., Cancian, L., Costi, M. P., Maltby, D. A., Jadhav, A., Inglese, J., Austin, C. P., & Shoichet, B. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-03-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2502-2511
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2039384791
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.