The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heteroaromatic Rings of the Future
Abstract
Small aromatic ring systems are of central importance in the development of novel synthetic protein ligands. Here we generate a complete list of 24,847 such ring systems. We call this list and associated annotations VEHICLe, which stands for virtual exploratory heterocyclic library. Searches of literature and compound databases, using this list as substructure queries, identified only 1701 as synthesized. Using a carefully validated machine learning approach, we were able to estimate that the number of unpublished, but synthetically tractable, VEHICLe rings could be over 3000. However, analysis also shows that the rate of publication of novel examples to be as low as 5-10 per year. With this work, we aim to provide fresh stimulus to creative organic chemists by highlighting a small set of apparently simple ring systems that are predicted to be tractable but are, to the best of our knowledge, unconquered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How many drug targets are there?
Overington, J. P., Al-Lazikani, B., & Hopkins, A. L. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2199 · Cited by 3,505
Hopkins, A. L., & Groom, C. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd892 · Cited by 3,305
Self-citation
Cited by
Reymond, J.-L. (2015) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar500432k · Cited by 720
Duchon, A., & Herault, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00104 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Pitt, W. R., Parry, D. M., Perry, B. G., & Groom, C. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-04-06
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2952-2963
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2063021257
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.