The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing Libraries with CNS Activity
Abstract
Library design is an important and difficult task. In this paper we describe one possible solution to designing a CNS-active library. CNS-actives and -inactives were selected from the CMC and the MDDR databases based on whether they were described as having some kind of CNS activity in the databases. This classification scheme results in over 15 000 actives and over 50 000 inactives. Each molecule is described by 7 1D descriptors (molecular weight, number of donors, number of acceptors, etc.) and 166 2D descriptors (presence/absence of functional groups such as NH(2)). A neural network trained using Bayesian methods can correctly predict about 75% of the actives and 65% of the inactives using the 7 1D descriptors. The performance improves to a prediction accuracy on the active set of 83% and 79% on the inactives on adding the 2D descriptors. On a database with 275 compounds where the CNS activity is known (from the literature) for each compound, we achieve 92% and 71% accuracy on the actives and inactives, respectively. The models we construct can therefore be used as a "filter" to examine any set of proposed molecules in a chemical library. As an example of the utility of our method, we describe the generation of a small library of potentially CNS-active molecules that would be amenable to combinatorial chemistry. This was done by building and analyzing a large database of a million compounds constructed from frameworks and side chains frequently found in drug molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can We Learn To Distinguish between “Drug-like” and “Nondrug-like” Molecules?
Ajay, Walters, W. P., & Murcko, M. A. (1998) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm970666c · Cited by 484
Self-citationA Scoring Scheme for Discriminating between Drugs and Nondrugs
Sadowski, J., & Kubinyi, H. (1998) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm9706776 · Cited by 392
Cited by
Drug Transport across the Blood–Brain Barrier
Pardridge, W. M. (2012) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.126 · Cited by 1,994
Medicinal chemical properties of successful central nervous system drugs
Pajouhesh, H., & Lenz, G. R. (2005) · NeuroRX · doi:10.1602/neurorx.2.4.541 · Cited by 1,535
Simple Selection Criteria for Drug-like Chemical Matter
Muegge, I., Heald, S. L., & Brittelli, D. (2001) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm015507e · Cited by 1,315
Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening
Bajorath, J. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd941 · Cited by 930
Doan, K. M. M., Humphreys, J. E., Webster, L. O., Wring, S. A., Shampine, L. J., Serabjit-Singh, C. J., Adkison, K. K., & Polli, J. W. (2002) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.102.039255 · Cited by 614
Metadata
- Authors
- Ajay, Bemis, G. W., & Murcko, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-11-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 4942-4951
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2085645854
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.