Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 590

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why the Standard B3LYP/6-31G* Model Chemistry Should Not Be Used in DFT Calculations of Molecular Thermochemistry: Understanding and Correcting the Problem

Kruse, Holger, Goerigk, Lars, Grimme, Stefan·2012·The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Abstract

We analyze the error compensations that are responsible for the relatively good performance of the popular B3LYP/6-31G* model chemistry for molecular thermochemistry. We present the B3LYP-gCP-D3/6-31G* scheme, which corrects for missing London dispersion and basis set superposition error (BSSE) in a physically sound manner. Benchmark results for the general main group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions set (GMTKN30) are presented. A detailed look is cast on organic reactions of several arenes with C(60), Diels-Alder reactions, and barriers to [4 + 3] cycloadditions. We demonstrate the practical advantages of the new B3LYP-gCP-D3/6-31G* scheme and show its higher robustness over standard B3LYP/6-31G*. B3LYP-gCP-D3/6-31G* is meant to fully substitute standard B3LYP/6-31G* calculations in the same black-box sense at essentially no increase in computational cost. The energy corrections are made available by a Web service ( http://www.thch.uni-bonn.de/tc/gcpd3 ) and by freely available software.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jo302156p

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 590

Metadata

Authors
Kruse, H., Goerigk, L., & Grimme, S.
Venue
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Published
2012-11-15
Volume
77
Issue
23
Pages
10824-10834
ISSN
  • 0022-3263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6904
OpenAlex
W2078082523
Cited by
590
References
5
FWCI
11.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why the Standard B3LYP/6-31G* Model Chemistry Should Not Be Used in DFT Calculations of Molecular Thermochemistry: Understanding and Correcting the Problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jo302156p
The paper
Kruse, H., Goerigk, L., & Grimme, S. (2012). Why the Standard B3LYP/6-31G* Model Chemistry Should Not Be Used in DFT Calculations of Molecular Thermochemistry: Understanding and Correcting the Problem. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo302156p

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.