The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Model Studies for New o-Nitrobenzyl Photolabile Linkers: Substituent Effects on the Rates of Photochemical Cleavage
Abstract
Both a model phenacyl and o-nitrobenzyl photolabile linker from the literature along with four new o-nitrobenzyl linkers were prepared and the kinetics of their photolytic cleavage examined in solution. The linkers were prepared by amidation of the carboxylic acid anchoring tether with benzylamine, and the cleavable benzylic substituent was chosen to be either acetic acid or acetamide. Irradiation of the linkers in four solvents (methanol, p-dioxane, and aqueous buffer +/- dithiothreitol) at 365 nm and analysis via HPLC afforded kinetic rates of cleavage suitable for comparative purposes. The phenacyl linker was found to cleave slowly under aqueous conditions with no detectable cleavage being observed in the organic solvents. Known o-nitrobenzyl linker 4 showed modest rates of cleavage in aqueous and organic solvents. Incorporation of two alkoxy groups in the benzene ring to generate the veratryl-based linker 13a increased the rate of cleavage dramatically, and introduction of an additional benzylic methyl group (13b) increased the rate of cleavage by an additional 5 fold. Increasing the length of the anchoring carboxylic acid tether from acetic to butyric acid (19) improved the cleavage kinetics modestly in organic media and slightly diminished the rates in water. The amide model linker 21 cleaved from 3 to 7 times faster than the corresponding ester linkage 19. An amide-generating linker 26 was prepared, and its performance to generate photolabile solid supports was briefly examined. The stability of the linker and subsequent cleavage upon photolysis from the support of an isotopically enriched 4-thiazolidinone was demonstrated by gel phase (13)C NMR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DeForest, C. A., & Anseth, K. S. (2011) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.1174 · Cited by 708
Linkers and Cleavage Strategies in Solid-Phase Organic Synthesis and Combinatorial Chemistry
Guillier, F., Orain, D., & Bradley, M. (2000) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr980040+ · Cited by 516
Chatani, S., Kloxin, C. J., & Bowman, C. N. (2014) · Polym. Chem. · doi:10.1039/c3py01334k · Cited by 408
Photoresponsive biomaterials for targeted drug delivery and 4D cell culture
Ruskowitz, E. R., & DeForest, C. A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.87 · Cited by 398
Toward Photocontrolled Release Using Light-Dissociable Block Copolymer Micelles
Jiang, J., Tong, X., Morris, D., & Zhao, Y. (2006) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma060142z · Cited by 393
Ipomoeassin F Binds Sec61α to Inhibit Protein Translocation
Zong, G., Hu, Z., O’Keefe, S., Tranter, D., Iannotti, M. J., Baron, L., Hall, B., Corfield, K., Paatero, A. O., Henderson, M. J., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b13506 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Holmes, C. P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Organic Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2370-2380
- ISSN
- 0022-3263 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6904
- OpenAlex
- W1968685749
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.