Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Theoretical Studies of the Properties and Solution Chemistry of AnO22+ and AnO2+ Aquo Complexes for An = U, Np, and Pu

Hay, P. Jeffrey, Martin, Richard L., Schreckenbach, Georg·2000·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

The structures and vibrational frequencies of UO 2 (H 2 O) 5 2+, NpO 2 (H 2 O) 5 2+, and PuO 2 (H 2 O) 5 2+ corresponding to An(VI) oxidation states and UO 2 (H 2 O) 5 +, Np(H 2 O) 5 +, and Pu(H 2 O) 5 + corresponding to An(V) have been calculated using density functional theory (DFT) and relativistic effective core potentials (RECPs). The resulting structures are compared to EXAFS solution studies, and the Raman and IR vibrational frequencies of the actinyl unit are compared to experimental studies in solution. Free energies for reactions in solution are computed by combining thermodynamic free energies in the gas phase with a dielectric continuum model to treat solvent effects. The hydrolysis reaction of UO 2 (H 2 O) 5 2+ to form UO 2 (H 2 O) 4 (OH) + and the reactions for removing or adding a water to the first shell in UO 2 (H 2 O) 5 2+ are examined using this approach. Multiplet and spin−orbit effects not included in a single-configuration DFT wave function are incorporated by model spin−orbit CI calculations. PuO 2 q+ is used as a model for the aquo complexes in a weak ligand field for the cases q = 3 (5f 1 configuration), q = 2 (5f 2 ) and q = 1 (5f 3 ). The inclusion of these effects results in a different ground state for NpO 2 (H 2 O) 5 2+ and PuO 2 (H 2 O) 5 2+ than that obtained in the original DFT calculations. The reduction potentials for all three AnO 2 (H 2 O) 5 2+ complexes in solution is compared with electrochemical experimental data. The trend for the reduction potentials NpO 2 (H 2 O) 5 2+ > PuO 2 (H 2 O) 5 2+ > UO 2 (H 2 O) 5 2+ is found in agreement with experiment, when multiplet and spin−orbit corrections are included, although the absolute reduction potentials are overestimated in all three cases. The possible reasons for this overestimate are examined using all-electron calculations using the ADF method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp000519h

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Hay, P. J., Martin, R. L., & Schreckenbach, G.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2000-06-14
Volume
104
Issue
26
Pages
6259-6270
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W2039294228
Cited by
261
References
17
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.