The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bond Dissociation Energies and Radical Stabilization Energies Associated with Substituted Methyl Radicals
Abstract
Bond dissociation energies (BDEs) and radical stabilization energies (RSEs) associated with a series of 22 monosubstituted methyl radicals ( • CH 2 X) have been determined at a variety of levels including, CBS-RAD, G3(MP2)-RAD, RMP2, UB3-LYP and RB3-LYP. In addition, W1‘ values were obtained for a subset of 13 of the radicals. The W1‘ BDEs and RSEs are generally close to experimental values and lead to the suggestion that a small number of the experimental estimates warrant reexamination. Of the other methods, CBS-RAD and G3(MP2)-RAD produce good BDEs. A cancellation of errors leads to reasonable RSEs being produced from all the methods examined. CBS-RAD, W1‘ and G3(MP2)-RAD perform best, while UB3-LYP performs worst. The substituents (X) examined include lone-pair-donors (X = NH 2, OH, OCH 3, F, PH 2, SH, Cl, Br and OCOCH 3 ), π-acceptors (X = BH 2, CH CH 2, C⋮CH, C 6 H 5, CHO, COOH, COOCH 3, CN and NO 2 ) and hyperconjugating groups (CH 3, CH 2 CH 3, CF 3 and CF 2 CF 3 ). All substituents other than CF 3 and CF 2 CF 3 result in radical stabilization, with the vinyl (CH CH 2 ), ethynyl (C⋮CH) and phenyl (C 6 H 5 ) groups predicted to give the largest stabilizations of the π-acceptor substituents examined and the NH 2 group calculated to provide the greatest stabilization of the lone-pair-donor groups. The substituents investigated in this work stabilize methyl radical centers in three general ways that delocalize the odd electron: π-acceptor groups (unsaturated substituents) delocalize the unpaired electron into the π-system of the substituent, lone-pair-donor groups (heteroatomic substituents) bring about stabilization through a three-electron interaction between a lone pair on the substituent and the unpaired electron at the radical center, while alkyl groups stabilize radicals via a hyperconjugative mechanism. Polyfluoroalkyl substituents are predicted to slightly destabilize a methyl radical center by inductively withdrawing electron density from the electron-deficient radical center.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CH and NH bond dissociation energies of five‐ and six‐membered ring aromatic compounds
Feng, Y., Wang, J., Liu, L., & Guo, Q. (2003) · Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1002/poc.679 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Henry, D. J., Parkinson, C. J., Mayer, P. M., & Radom, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-06-15
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 6750-6756
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2087865210
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.