The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiple Band Gap Semiconductor/Electrolyte Solar Energy Conversion
Abstract
Fundamental and experimental multiple band gap semiconductor/electrolyte processes to convert optical energy and utilize renewable solar energy are explored. Alternate processes discussed include an inverted (1 photon per e - ) or bipolar ( n ≥ 2 photons per e - ) arrangement of successive band gaps. Such processes can incorporate either a Schottky or an ohmic photoelectrochemical solution interface that can drive either regenerative single or multiple different redox reactions. The multiple redox case permits solar energy storage or solar water splitting evolving H 2 and provides an energy reservoir that may compensate for the intermittent nature of solar energy. Generated H 2 is attractive as a clean, renewable fuel. Experimental configurations examined include GaAs/Si or AlGaAs/Si photodriven redox couples, each with a solar to electrical conversion efficiency of 19−20%. A related solar cell is configured with electrochemical storage, which provides a nearly constant energetic output in illuminated or dark conditions. Similarly, multiple band gap semiconductors can also be utilized to generate hydrogen fuel by solar driven water splitting. A cell containing illuminated AlGaAs/Si RuO 2 /Pt black evolves H 2 and O 2 at record (18.3%) efficiency. Contemporary models underestimate the attainable efficiency of solar energy conversion to water splitting, and future multiple band gap/electrolyte systems are calculated as being capable of attaining over 30% solar efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grätzel, M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35104607 · Cited by 12,687
Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway
Liu, J., Liu, Y., Liu, N., Han, Y., Zhang, X., Huang, H., Lifshitz, Y., Lee, S.-T., Zhong, J., & Kang, Z. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa3145 · Cited by 4,468
Hanna, M. C., & Nozik, A. J. (2006) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2356795 · Cited by 1,506
“Green” path from fossil-based to hydrogen economy: An overview of carbon-neutral technologies
MURADOV, N., & VEZIROGLU, T. (2008) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.054 · Cited by 980
Recent Advances and Prospective in Ruthenium-Based Materials for Electrochemical Water Splitting
Yu, J., He, Q., Yang, G., Zhou, W., Shao, Z., & Ni, M. (2019) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b02457 · Cited by 789
Sasaki, Y., Nemoto, H., Saito, K., & Kudo, A. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp907128k · Cited by 503
Photocatalytic water splitting for solar hydrogen generation: fundamentals and recent advancements
Yuan, L., Han, C., Yang, M.-Q., & Xu, Y.-J. (2016) · International Reviews in Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1080/0144235x.2015.1127027 · Cited by 351
Water Splitting Progress in Tandem Devices: Moving Photolysis beyond Electrolysis
Zhang, K., Ma, M., Li, P., Wang, D. H., & Park, J. H. (2016) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201600602 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Licht, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-06-14
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 6281-6294
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2950493744
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.