Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 506

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the Enthalpy of Formation of Hydroxyl Radical and Gas-Phase Bond Dissociation Energies of Water and Hydroxyl

Ruscic, Branko, Wagner, Albert F., Harding, Lawrence B., Asher, Robert L., Feller, David, Dixon, David A., Peterson, Kirk A., Song, Yang, Qian, Ximei, Ng, Cheuk-Yiu, Liu, Jianbo, Chen, Wenwu, Schwenke, David W.·2002·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

In a recent letter ( J. Phys. Chem. A, 2001, 105,1), we argued that, although all major thermochemical tables recommend a value of (OH) based on a spectroscopic approach, the correct value is 0.5 kcal/mol lower as determined from an ion cycle. In this paper, we expand upon and augment both the experimental and theoretical arguments presented in the letter. In particular, three separate experiments (mass-selected photoionization measurements, pulsed-field-ionization photoelectron spectroscopy measurements, and photoelectron-photoion coincidence measurements) utilizing the positive ion cycle to derive the O−H bond energy are shown to converge to a consensus value of the appearance energy AE 0 (OH + /H 2 O) = 146117 ± 24 cm -1 (18.116 2 ± 0.003 0 eV). With the most accurate currently available zero kinetic energy photoionization value for the ionization energy IE(OH) = 104989 ± 2 cm -1, corroborated by a number of photoelectron measurements, this leads to D 0 (H−OH) = 41128 ± 24 cm -1 = 117.59 ± 0.07 kcal/mol. This corresponds to Δ H f0 (OH) = 8.85 ± 0.07 kcal/mol and implies D 0 (OH) = 35593 ± 24 cm -1 = 101.76 ± 0.07 kcal/mol. These results are completely supported by the most sophisticated theoretical calculations ever performed on the H x O system, CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVnZ, n = Q, 5, 6, and 7, extrapolated to the CBS limit and including corrections for core-valence effects, scalar relativistic effects, incomplete correlation recovery, and diagonal Born−Oppenheimer corrections. These calculations have an estimated theoretical error of ≤0.2 kcal/mol based on basis set convergence properties. They reproduce the experimental results for dissociation energies, atomization energies, and ionization energies for the H x O system to within 0.0−0.2 kcal/mol. In contrast, the previously accepted values of the two successive bond dissociation energies of water differ from the current values by 0.5 kcal/mol. These values were derived from the spectroscopic determinations of D 0 (OH) using a very short Birge−Sponer extrapolation on OH/OD A 1 Σ + . However, on the basis of a calculation of the A state potential energy curve (with a multireference single and double excitation wave function and an aug-cc-pV5Z basis set) and an exhaustive reanalyzis of the original measured data on both the A and B states of OH, the Birge−Sponer extrapolation can be demonstrated to significantly underestimate the bond dissociation energy, although only the last vibrational level was not observed experimentally. The recommended values of this paper affect a large number of other thermochemical quantities which directly or indirectly rely on or refer to D 0 (H−OH), D 0 (OH), or . This is illustrated by an analysis of several reaction enthalpies, deprotonation enthalpies, and proton affinities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp013909s

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ruscic, B., Wagner, A. F., Harding, L. B., Asher, R. L., Feller, D., Dixon, D. A., Peterson, K. A., Song, Y., Qian, X., Ng, C.-Y., Liu, J., Chen, W., & Schwenke, D. W.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2002-02-27
Volume
106
Issue
11
Pages
2727-2747
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W2163746642
Cited by
506
References
0
FWCI
24.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.