The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Bulk Native Crystalline and Amorphous Structures of Cellulose
Abstract
Molecular modeling has been performed on three cellulosic systems: the two native crystalline phases (Iα and Iβ) and an amorphous phase, constituted by four independent microstructures. The goal of the study is to describe different organizations of the material and to emphasize how crystalline and amorphous celluloses differ. Besides, the study of the crystal structures for which many experimental data are available allows an estimation of the ability of the force field to model condensed phases of cellulose. For these organized structures the bulk parameters, such as unit cell dimensions, densities, Hildebrand solubility parameters, and hydrogen bonding, compare favorably well with the available experimental measures. The individual cellulose chains conformational behavior is as expected: torsion angles of the glycosidic bonds explore the g- values, hydroxymethyl groups are in the tg orientation, and the pyranoid ring puckering is in the 4 C 1 chair form. On the contrary, all the conformational parameters of the amorphous models show large variations: preferred values of the glycosidic bond torsion angles reproduce, however, the potential energy surface of cellobiose model compound. Furthermore, the Φ torsion angle behavior is in good concordance with the exo-anomeric effect. Hydroxymethyl groups explore mostly the gg and gt orientations, and high-energy puckering of the pyran rings is stabilized within the amorphous solid. Interchain interactions on both amorphous and crystalline structures are analyzed by means of the hydrogen bonding network. Finally, estimation of the glass transition temperature of an amorphous microstructure is given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers
Favier, V., Chanzy, H., & Cavaille, J. Y. (1995) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00122a053 · Cited by 1,149
Sugiyama, J., Vuong, R., & Chanzy, H. (1991) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00014a033 · Cited by 791
Cited by
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Azizi Samir, M. A. S., Alloin, F., & Dufresne, A. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm0493685 · Cited by 2,311
Cellulose and the role of hydrogen bonds: not in charge of everything
Wohlert, M., Benselfelt, T., Wågberg, L., Furó, I., Berglund, L. A., & Wohlert, J. (2022) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-021-04325-4 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazeau, K., & Heux, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-02-12
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2394-2403
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2071999855
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.