Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

From the Multiple-Well Master Equation to Phenomenological Rate Coefficients: Reactions on a C3H4 Potential Energy Surface

Miller, James A., Klippenstein, Stephen J.·2003·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

Using various forms of electronic-structure theory to characterize the important features of the potential energy surface, RRKM theory to calculate microcanonical rate coeffients, and several formulations of the master equation to predict phenomenological rate coefficients, we have studied a number of reactions that occur on the C 3 H 4 potential. We discuss the results in some detail and compare them with experiment when possible. Generally, the agreement with experiment is excellent. “Multiple-well effects” are emphasized throughout the discussion. We cast our results in the form of modified Arrhenius functions for use in chemical kinetics modeling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp0221082

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Miller, J. A., & Klippenstein, S. J.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2003-03-21
Volume
107
Issue
15
Pages
2680-2692
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W1985729863
Cited by
219
References
0
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.