The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Excitonic Solar Cells
Abstract
Existing types of solar cells may be divided into two distinct classes: conventional solar cells, such as silicon p−n junctions, and excitonic solar cells, XSCs. Most organic-based solar cells, including dye-sensitized solar cells, DSSCs, fall into the category of XSCs. In these cells, excitons are generated upon light absorption, and if not created directly at the heterointerface as in DSSCs, they must diffuse to it in order to photogenerate charge carriers. The distinguishing characteristic of XSCs is that charge carriers are generated and simultaneously separated across a heterointerface. In contrast, photogeneration of free electron−hole pairs occurs throughout the bulk semiconductor in conventional cells, and carrier separation upon their arrival at the junction is a subsequent process. This apparently minor mechanistic distinction results in fundamental differences in photovoltaic behavior. For example, the open circuit photovoltage V oc in conventional cells is limited to less than the magnitude of the band bending Ø bi; however, V oc in XSCs is commonly greater than Ø bi . Early work on solid-state excitonic solar cells is described as are excitonic processes in general and the use of carrier-selective (energy-selective) contacts to enhance V oc . Then studies of DSSCs, which provide a particularly simple example of XSCs, are described. A general theoretical description applicable to all solar cells is employed to quantify the differences between conventional and excitonic cells. The key difference is the dominant importance, in XSCs, of the photoinduced chemical potential energy gradient ∇ μ h ν, which was created by the interfacial exciton dissociation process. Numerical simulations demonstrate the difference in photoconversion mechanism caused solely by changing the spatial distribution of the photogenerated carriers. Finally, the similarities and differences are explored between the three major types of XSCs: organic semiconductor cells with planar interfaces, bulk heterojunction cells, and DSSCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films
O'Regan, B., & Grätzel, M. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/353737a0 · Cited by 28,599
Cited by
Small Molecule Organic Semiconductors on the Move: Promises for Future Solar Energy Technology
Mishra, A., & Bäuerle, P. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201102326 · Cited by 1,816
From Ultrafast to Ultraslow: Charge-Carrier Dynamics of Perovskite Solar Cells
Shi, J., Li, Y., Li, Y., Li, D., Luo, Y., Wu, H., & Meng, Q. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.010 · Cited by 341
Review: Dye sensitised solar cells
Arjunan, T. V., & Senthil, T. S. (2013) · Materials Technology · doi:10.1179/1753555712y.0000000040 · Cited by 82
Angiolini, L., Cocchi, V., Lanzi, M., Salatelli, E., Tonelli, D., & Vlamidis, Y. (2014) · Materials Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.03.054 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Gregg, B. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-05-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4688-4698
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W1964835060
- Cited by
- 790
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Excitonic Solar Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp022507x
- The paper
- Gregg, B. A. (2003). Excitonic Solar Cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp022507x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.