Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,152

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Chemical Oxidation on the Structure of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

Zhang, Jin, Zou, Hongling, Qing, Quan, Yang, Yanlian, Li, Qingwen, Liu, Zhongfan, Guo, Xinyong, Du, Zuliang·2003·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

In the present study, we report the systematic investigation of the effect of chemical oxidation on the structure of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) by using different oxidants. The oxidation procedure was characterized by using infrared spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The SWNTs were produced by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and oxidized with three kinds of oxidants: (1) nitric acid (2.6 M), (2) a mixture of concentrated sulfuric acid (98 wt %) and concentrated nitric acid (16 M) (v/v = 3/1) and (3) KMnO 4 . The results reveal that the different functional groups can be introduced when the SWNTs are treated with different oxidants. Refluxing in dilute nitric acid can be considered as a mild oxidation for SWNTs, introducing the carboxylic acid groups only at those initial defects that already exist. The abundance of the carboxylic acid groups generated with this oxidant remained constant along with the treating time. In contrast, sonication of SWNTs in H 2 SO 4 /HNO 3 increased the incidence of carboxylic acid groups not only at initial defect sites but also at newly created defect sites along the walls of SWNTs. Compared to the two oxidants above, when KMnO 4 in alkali was used as the oxidant, which is relatively mild, different amounts of −OH, −C O, and −COOH groups were introduced. The oxidation processes begin mainly with the oxidation of the initial defects that arise during the CVD growth of the SWNTs and are accompanied by processes that can be roughly divided into two steps: (1) the defect-generating step and (2) the defect-consuming step. Specifically, during the defect-generating step, the oxidants attack the graphene structure by electrophilic reactions and generate active sites such as −OH and −C O. This step depends on the oxidant's ability to generate −C−OH groups and to transform them into −C O groups. During the defect-consuming step, the graphene structure of the tube was destroyed by the oxidation of the generated active sites in step 1. The defect-consuming step mostly counts on the ability of the oxidant to etch/destroy the graphite-like structure around the already generated −C O and their neighborhood groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp027500u

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,152

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, J., Zou, H., Qing, Q., Yang, Y., Li, Q., Liu, Z., Guo, X., & Du, Z.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2003-03-27
Volume
107
Issue
16
Pages
3712-3718
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2128711016
Cited by
1,152
References
0
FWCI
16.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Chemical Oxidation on the Structure of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp027500u
The paper
Zhang, J., Zou, H., Qing, Q., Yang, Y., Li, Q., Liu, Z., Guo, X., & Du, Z. (2003). Effect of Chemical Oxidation on the Structure of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp027500u

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.