The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical Prediction of the Co−C Bond Strength in Cobalamins
Open accessAbstract
The homolytic Co−C bond dissociation energy (BDE) is central to the understanding of the function of vitamin B 12, an important coenzyme of many proteins. We investigate why earlier density functional (B3LYP) estimations of the BDE in methylcobalamin have given so poor results (91−117 kJ/mol) compared to the experimental estimate (155 ± 13 kJ/mol). Improving the basis set increases the discrepancy, as does a proper treatment of basis set superposition error (∼3 kJ/mol) and inclusion of zero-point energy corrections (−21 kJ/mol). On the other hand, relativistic (+6 kJ/mol), solvation (+7 kJ/mol in water), and thermal corrections (+6 kJ/mol) increase the BDE. However, neither of these corrections can explain the discrepancy. Instead, the problem seems to be the B3LYP density functional, which gives a corrected BDE of 78 kJ/mol, whereas the density functional Becke−Perdew-86 method and second-order perturbation theory (MP2) give BDEs of 134−139 kJ/mol. A comparison with other methods indicates that the error comes from the Hartree−Fock exchange (∼40 kJ/mol) and the LYP functional (∼15 kJ/mol). The problem is not restricted to methylcobalamin but seems to be general for homolytic metal−carbon BDEs of transition metals in tetra-pyrrole-like systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions
Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.438955 · Cited by 17,772
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Cited by
Density functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry
Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2009) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b907148b · Cited by 1,648
Computational electrochemistry: prediction of liquid-phase reduction potentials
Marenich, A. V., Ho, J., Coote, M. L., Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp01572j · Cited by 508
The quantum chemical cluster approach for modeling enzyme reactions
Siegbahn, P. E. M., & Himo, F. (2011) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.13 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, K. P., & Ryde, U.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-08-29
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 7539-7545
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W1998891503
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.