The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Systematic Investigation of Modern Quantum Chemical Methods to Predict Electronic Circular Dichroism Spectra
Abstract
The ability of different quantum chemical methods to predict experimental electronic circular dichroism (CD) spectra is critically evaluated. Two single-reference, time-dependent approaches based either on density functional theory (TDDFT) or a simplified coupled-cluster expansion (CC2) and two multireference methods (MRMP2 and DFT/MRCI) are considered. The methods are applied to a test suite of seven molecules including a wide range of difficult chromophores (“real-life” examples) and to three model systems H 2 S 2, twisted ethylene, and dimethyloxirane where accurate ab initio MRCI reference data are used for comparison. To investigate the effect of “exact” exchange mixing systematically, the TDDFT calculations were carried out with the BP86, B3-LYP, and BH-LYP functionals. The time-dependent Hartree−Fock (TDHF) method was included as an “upper limit” for the HF-exchange part in the functional. In general, it is found that the accuracy of most of the simulated spectra (except those from TDHF) is good enough to assign absolute configurations of chiral molecules with very high certainty. However, the description of weakly disturbed, inherently achiral chromophores and systems with Rydberg−valence mixing turned out to be rather difficult. Furthermore, none of the methods perform reliably for all of the molecules in the test suite, and in particular, the TDDFT results are very sensitive to the functional used. The best overall performance is achieved with the DFT/MRCI and CC2 methods. The TDDFT method should be used carefully, especially for systems with important diffuse or charge-transfer states. Out of the three functionals tested, B3-LYP seems to perform best. In practice, we highly recommend the simultaneous application of different complementary single and multireference methods, which significantly increases the reliability of theoretical predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laurent, A. D., & Jacquemin, D. (2013) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24438 · Cited by 1,382
Berova, N., Bari, L. D., & Pescitelli, G. (2007) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b515476f · Cited by 1,376
Baiardi, A., Bloino, J., & Barone, V. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400450k · Cited by 423
Myrgorodska, I., Meinert, C., Hoffmann, S. V., Jones, N. C., Nahon, L., & Meierhenrich, U. J. (2017) · ChemPlusChem · doi:10.1002/cplu.201600214 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Diedrich, C., & Grimme, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-03-18
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2524-2539
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W1975758354
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Investigation of Modern Quantum Chemical Methods to Predict Electronic Circular Dichroism Spectra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp0275802
- The paper
- Diedrich, C., & Grimme, S. (2003). Systematic Investigation of Modern Quantum Chemical Methods to Predict Electronic Circular Dichroism Spectra. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0275802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.