The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polarizable Atomic Multipole Water Model for Molecular Mechanics Simulation
Abstract
A new classical empirical potential is proposed for water. The model uses a polarizable atomic multipole description of electrostatic interactions. Multipoles through the quadrupole are assigned to each atomic center based on a distributed multipole analysis (DMA) derived from large basis set molecular orbital calculations on the water monomer. Polarization is treated via self-consistent induced atomic dipoles. A modified version of Thole's interaction model is used to damp induction at short range. Repulsion−dispersion (vdW) effects are computed from a buffered 14−7 potential. In a departure from most current water potentials, we find that significant vdW parameters are necessary on hydrogen as well as oxygen. The new potential is fully flexible and has been tested versus a variety of experimental data and quantum calculations for small clusters, liquid water, and ice. Overall, excellent agreement with experimental and high level ab initio results is obtained for numerous properties, including cluster structures and energetics and bulk thermodynamic and structural measures. The parametrization scheme described here is easily extended to other molecular systems, and the resulting water potential should provide a useful explicit solvent model for organic solutes and biopolymer modeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Statistical Mechanics: A Set of Lectures
Feynman, R. P., & Lebowitz, J. L. (1973) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3128279 · Cited by 423
Cited by
Thompson, A. P., Aktulga, H. M., Berger, R., Bolintineanu, D. S., Brown, W. M., Crozier, P. S., in 't Veld, P. J., Kohlmeyer, A., Moore, S. G., Nguyen, T. D., et al. (2022) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 · Cited by 12,598
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field
Ponder, J. W., Wu, C., Ren, P., Pande, V. S., Chodera, J. D., Schnieders, M. J., Haque, I., Mobley, D. L., Lambrecht, D. S., DiStasio, R. A., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp910674d · Cited by 1,440
Self-citationSimulation of Ca2+ and Mg2+ Solvation Using Polarizable Atomic Multipole Potential
Jiao, D., King, C., Grossfield, A., Darden, T. A., & Ren, P. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp062230r · Cited by 278
Self-citationThe Properties of Water: Insights from Quantum Simulations
Paesani, F., & Voth, G. A. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp810590c · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Ren, P., & Ponder, J. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-05-24
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 5933-5947
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2077501220
- Cited by
- 1,414
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.