The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methodological Issues in Lipid Bilayer Simulations
Open accessAbstract
Methodological issues in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, such as the treatment of long-range electrostatic interactions or the type of pressure coupling, have important consequences for the equilibrium properties observed. We report a series of long (up to 150 ns) MD simulations of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) bilayers in which the methodology of simulation is systematically varied. Comparisons of simulations with truncation schemes, Ewald summations, and modified Coulomb interactions, either by shift functions or reaction field models, to describe long-range electrostatics point out the artifacts inherent in each of these methods and above all those of straight cutoff methods. We further show that bilayer properties are less sensitive to the details of the pressure-coupling algorithm and that an increased integration time step of 5 fs can be safely used in simulations of phosphatidylcholine lipid bilayers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nagle, J. F., Zhang, R., Tristram-Nagle, S., Sun, W., Petrache, H. I., & Suter, R. M. (1996) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79701-1 · Cited by 472
Cited by
Coarse Grained Model for Semiquantitative Lipid Simulations
Marrink, S. J., de Vries, A. H., & Mark, A. E. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp036508g · Cited by 2,257
Jämbeck, J. P. M., & Lyubartsev, A. P. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp212503e · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Anézo, C., de Vries, A. H., Höltje, H.-D., Tieleman, D. P., & Marrink, S.-J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-08-05
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 9424-9433
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2169980354
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.