The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemical Diffusion Coefficient of Electrons in Nanostructured Semiconductor Electrodes and Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
Abstract
The properties and physical interpretation of the electron diffusion coefficient, D n, observed in nanostructured semiconductors and dye-sensitized solar cells by small perturbation electrical and electrooptical techniques are investigated. The chemical diffusion coefficient is defined as the product of a thermodynamic factor (that accounts for the effect of nonideal statistics in a gradient of chemical potential) and a jump diffusion coefficient (that depends on average hopping distances and rates). The thermodynamic and kinetic similarities, as well as the differences, between interacting ions in the lattice and electrons in nanostructured semiconductors are discussed. From these considerations, the chemical diffusion coefficient of electrons for multiple trapping transport in nanoporous dye solar cells can be calculated indirectly, and the results are in agreement with the reduction of the kinetic-transport equations in the quasistatic approximation. The chemical diffusion coefficient in several models for electrons is discussed: for a wide but stationary distribution of sites energies, giving the Fermi-level dependent D n [Fisher et al. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 949] and for the enhancement of the diffusivity by effect of electrostatic shift of energy levels [Vanmaekelbergh et al. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 747]. This last model is shown to correspond to the mean-field approximation to interaction in a lattice gas. A general expression containing all of these cases is provided, and several important consequences of the distinction between macroscopic diffusion and single particle random walk are pointed out.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Characterization of nanostructured hybrid and organic solar cells by impedance spectroscopy
Fabregat-Santiago, F., Garcia-Belmonte, G., Mora-Seró, I., & Bisquert, J. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c0cp02249g · Cited by 1,206
Self-citationElectron Lifetime in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Theory and Interpretation of Measurements
Bisquert, J., Fabregat-Santiago, F., Mora-Seró, I., Garcia-Belmonte, G., & Giménez, S. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp9037649 · Cited by 771
Self-citationAdvances in Liquid‐Electrolyte and Solid‐State Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells
Snaith, H. J., & Schmidt‐Mende, L. (2007) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200602903 · Cited by 616
Barnes, P. R. F., Miettunen, K., Li, X., Anderson, A. Y., Bessho, T., Gratzel, M., & O'Regan, B. C. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201201372 · Cited by 296
Eckhoff, M., Lausch, K. N., Blöchl, P. E., & Behler, J. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0021452 · Cited by 45
“because the electron hopping occurs always to adjacent Mn sites with the nearest-neighbor Mn-Mn distance d [86].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bisquert, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-01-23
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2323-2332
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2007866565
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.