The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Development of Replica-Exchange-Based Free-Energy Methods
Abstract
The calculation of relative free energies that involve large reorganizations of the environment is one of the great challenges of condensed-phase simulation. Such calculations are of particular importance in protein−ligand free-energy calculations. To meet this challenge, we have developed new free-energy techniques that combine the advantages of the replica-exchange method with free-energy perturbation (FEP) and finite-difference thermodynamic integration (FDTI). These new techniques are tested and compared with FEP, FDTI, and the adaptive umbrella weighted histogram analysis method (AdUmWHAM) on the challenging calculation of the relative hydration free energy of methane and water. This calculation involves a large solvent configurational change. Through the use of replica-exchange moves along the λ-coordinate, the configurations sampled along λ are allowed to mix, which leads to dramatic improvements in solvent configurational sampling, an efficient reduction of random sampling error, and a reduction of general simulation error. This is achieved at effectively no extra computational cost, relative to standard FEP or FDTI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD
Phillips, J. C., Hardy, D. J., Maia, J. D. C., Stone, J. E., Ribeiro, J. V., Bernardi, R. C., Buch, R., Fiorin, G., Hénin, J., Jiang, W., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0014475 · Cited by 3,144
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Membrane Permeability
Venable, R. M., Krämer, A., & Pastor, R. W. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00486 · Cited by 394
Standard Binding Free Energies from Computer Simulations: What Is the Best Strategy?
Gumbart, J. C., Roux, B., & Chipot, C. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct3008099 · Cited by 343
Abrams, J. B., & Tuckerman, M. E. (2008) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp805039u · Cited by 221
Water, water, everywhere… It’s time to stop and think.
Bodnarchuk, M. S. (2016) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2016.05.009 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Woods, C. J., Essex, J. W., & King, M. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-11-14
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 13703-13710
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W1982306719
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.