The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photoelectron Spectroscopy and ab Initio Study of B3-and B4-Anions and Their Neutrals
Abstract
The two smallest boron clusters (B 3 and B 4 ) in their neutral and anionic forms were studied by photoelectron spectroscopy and ab initio calculations. Vibrationally resolved photoelectron spectra were observed for B 3 - at three photon energies (355, 266, and 193 nm), and the electron affinity of B 3 was measured to be 2.82 ± 0.02 eV. An unusually intense peak due to two-electron transitions was observed in the 193-nm spectrum of B 3 - at 4.55 eV and its origin was theoretically characterized. We confirmed that both B 3 - and B 3 are π and σ aromatic systems with D 3 h symmetry. The photoelectron spectra of B 4 - were also obtained at the three photon energies, but much broader spectra were observed. The B 4 - anion was found to have the lowest electron detachment energy (∼1.6 eV) among all boron clusters with three or more atoms, consistent with its extremely weak mass signals. The neutral B 4 cluster was found to have a D 2 h rhombus structure, which is only slightly distorted from a perfect square. For B 4 -, we identified computationally two low-lying isomers ( 2 B 1u and 2 A g ) both with D 2 h symmetry, with the 2 B 1u state slightly more stable, which is confirmed through comparison of the calculated spectra with the experimental spectra. The chemical bonding of the two small boron clusters is discussed in terms of aromaticity and antiaromaticity both in the π and σ frameworks. We demonstrated that the aromaticity and antiaromaticity concepts provide us a clear explanation of the chemical structure and bonding in these two boron clusters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0940 · Cited by 14,314
Cited by
All-boron aromatic clusters as potential new inorganic ligands and building blocks in chemistry
Alexandrova, A. N., Boldyrev, A. I., Zhai, H.-J., & Wang, L.-S. (2006) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.032 · Cited by 712
Self-citationUnderstanding Boron through Size-Selected Clusters: Structure, Chemical Bonding, and Fluxionality
Sergeeva, A. P., Popov, I. A., Piazza, Z. A., Li, W.-L., Romanescu, C., Wang, L.-S., & Boldyrev, A. I. (2014) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar400310g · Cited by 608
Self-citationAll-Metal Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity
Boldyrev, A. I., & Wang, L.-S. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030091t · Cited by 608
Self-citationA concentric planar doubly π-aromatic B19− cluster
Huang, W., Sergeeva, A. P., Zhai, H.-J., Averkiev, B. B., Wang, L.-S., & Boldyrev, A. I. (2010) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.534 · Cited by 532
Self-citationAll-boron analogues of aromatic hydrocarbons: B17− and B18−
Sergeeva, A. P., Averkiev, B. B., Zhai, H.-J., Boldyrev, A. I., & Wang, L.-S. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3599452 · Cited by 332
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhai, H.-J., Wang, L.-S., Alexandrova, A. N., Boldyrev, A. I., & Zakrzewski, V. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-10-10
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 9319-9328
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W194243151
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photoelectron Spectroscopy and ab Initio Study of B3-and B4-Anions and Their Neutrals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp0357119
- The paper
- Zhai, H.-J., Wang, L.-S., Alexandrova, A. N., Boldyrev, A. I., & Zakrzewski, V. G. (2003). Photoelectron Spectroscopy and ab Initio Study of B3-and B4-Anions and Their Neutrals. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0357119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.