Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interfacial Rheology of Globular and Flexible Proteins at the Hexadecane/Water Interface: Comparison of Shear and Dilatation Deformation

Freer, Erik M., Yim, Kang Sub, Fuller, Gerald G., Radke, Clayton J.·2004·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

After long-time exposure, protein adsorption at fluid/fluid interfaces is documented to produce interfacial, gellike networks. Formation of this network apparently results from adsorption-induced conformational changes and subsequent interprotein aggregation at the interface. We utilize interfacial shear and dilatational rheology to probe the structure of a globular protein, lysozyme, and a disordered protein, β-casein, and the kinetics of network formation at the hexadecane/water interface. For the first time, we present a detailed comparison of the interfacial shear and dilatational responses. For lysozyme, the shear moduli grow with interface age indicating a transition from fluidlike behavior at early times to network formation (solidlike behavior). Conversely, the interfacial shear moduli of β-casein change very little with interface age; in addition, both G ‘ and G ‘ ‘ for β-casein are an order of magnitude smaller than those of lysozyme. The strong protein intramolecular interactions that stabilize the native conformation of lysozyme act as kinetic barriers to conformational change and later become strong intermolecular interactions upon partial unfolding at the interface. Hence, interprotein linkages form (i.e., aggregation into an interfacial gel), resulting in the growth of G ‘ with time. We find that the interfacial dilatational storage modulus, E ‘, is comprised of a static response and a dynamic response. The static response corresponds to a change in the surface pressure upon interfacial-area change and is strain-rate independent. The dynamic contribution corresponds to rearrangement and reconfiguration of the protein molecules within the interface and is analogous to the shear storage response (i.e., a measure of the strength of interprotein linkages). The magnitudes of E ‘ and G ‘ for lysozyme and β-casein suggest that lysozyme initially adsorbs in a state similar to its native conformation. The native rigidity of the protein is linked to its kinetic stability at the interface. Globular lysozyme, once adsorbed, resists compression giving a high dilatational storage modulus. Contrastingly, native β-casein lacks tertiary structure, resulting in a small interfacial dilatational storage modulus relative to lysozyme. With increasing interface age, the static modulus of β-casein changes insignificantly, whereas it decreases substantially for lysozyme, indicating partial unfolding and loss of intrinsic rigidity. Upon unfolding, interprotein linkages form through hydrophobic peptide−peptide interactions. Correspondingly, G ‘ and the recoverable dilatational storage modulus, δ E ‘, grow, signifying the onset of interfacial gelation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp037236k

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Freer, E. M., Yim, K. S., Fuller, G. G., & Radke, C. J.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2004-02-24
Volume
108
Issue
12
Pages
3835-3844
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W1979679542
Cited by
308
References
0
FWCI
22.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.