The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distance and Orientation Dependence of Excitation Transfer Rates in Conjugated Systems: Beyond the Förster Theory
Abstract
The distance ( R DA ) and orientation dependence of the rate for electronic excitation transfer (EET) from a segment of polyfluorene (PF 6 ) to tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP) is studied using semiempirical quantum chemical methods. The fundamental issue concerns the applicability of the traditional Förster theory, which uses a point-dipole approximation, in describing the transfer rate in such systems involving large chromophores that may approach each other closely. In our theoretical calculation of the resonance-Coulomb rate, explicit account is taken of the extended transition dipole moment densities that are spread along the donor and acceptor molecules. Although we recover the Förster rate at large separations, the present study reveals several results not anticipated in the conventional theory: (a) The actual rate shows a much weaker short-range distance dependence (closer to than to the Förster value). The Förster expression overestimates the energy transfer rate by more than 2 orders of magnitude at short separation ( R DA < 1 nm). (b) The distance at which the Förster rate is recovered is observed to be rather large (∼10 nm). Thus, the Förster expression seems to be inappropriate for condensed-phase systems where donors and acceptors can be closely packed, as, for example, in thin films. (c) Significant excitation transfer can occur via states that are optically dark (that is, carry very small oscillator strength). Förster theory excludes these potentially important pathways. (d) Irrespective of the interchromophore separation, the calculated orientation dependence of the resonance-Coulomb rates generally follows the Förster expression, with dependence on the cosine of the angle between the donor and acceptor transition dipole moment vectors. At close distances, however, the orientation dependence can make the rates differ by a factor of ∼2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beyond Förster Resonance Energy Transfer in Biological and Nanoscale Systems
Beljonne, D., Curutchet, C., Scholes, G. D., & Silbey, R. J. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp900708f · Cited by 451
Marsh, R. A., Hodgkiss, J. M., Albert-Seifried, S., & Friend, R. H. (2010) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl9038289 · Cited by 290
Dynamics of Excitons in Conjugated Molecules and Organic Semiconductor Systems
Dimitriev, O. P. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00648 · Cited by 267
The Structure and Dynamics of Molecular Excitons
Bardeen, C. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103654 · Cited by 264
Regioregular Polythiophene–Porphyrin Supramolecular Copolymers for Optoelectronic Applications
Chevrier, M., Kesters, J., Blayo, C., Richeter, S., Van Der Lee, A., Coulembier, O., Surin, M., Mehdi, A., Lazzaroni, R., Evans, R. C., et al. (2016) · Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.1002/macp.201500280 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, K. F., Bagchi, B., & Rossky, P. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-06-15
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 5752-5763
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2030745215
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distance and Orientation Dependence of Excitation Transfer Rates in Conjugated Systems: Beyond the Förster Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp037724s
- The paper
- Wong, K. F., Bagchi, B., & Rossky, P. J. (2004). Distance and Orientation Dependence of Excitation Transfer Rates in Conjugated Systems: Beyond the Förster Theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp037724s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.