Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ab Initio Quality Electrostatic Atomic and Molecular Properties Including Intermolecular Energies from a Transferable Theoretical Pseudoatom Databank

Volkov, Anatoliy, Li, Xue, Koritsanszky, Tibor, Coppens, Philip·2004·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

The development of a theoretical databank of transferable pseudoatoms for fast prediction of the electron densities and related electronic properties of proteins is described. Chemically unique pseudoatoms identified on the basis of common connectivity and bonding are extracted from ab initio molecular densities of a large number of small molecules using a least-squares projection technique in Fourier transform space. The performance of the databank is evaluated by comparison of the electron densities and electrostatic properties of the amino acids GLN, SER, and LEU and their dimers with those obtained from molecular calculations on the same test compounds. It is found that deformation density bond peaks are reproduced to within 0.02−0.10 e/Å 3, whereas electrostatic potentials, bond critical point indices, atomic charges, and molecular moments show differences with results from calculations performed directly on the test molecules which are comparable with or smaller than the spread of the values between different ab initio methods (Hamiltonian, basis set, etc.). The order of intermolecular electrostatic interaction energies for selected dimers of the test compounds are well reproduced, though the results are always smaller, by about 25 kJ/mol on average, than electrostatic energies from Morokuma−Ziegler decomposition of the total interaction energy evaluated with the ADF program. The difference is attributed to the limitations of the Buckingham-type approximation for electrostatic interactions, used in the current study, which assumes nonoverlapping charge densities. The consistency achieved by the pseudoatom databank is much better than that obtained with the AMBER99, CHARMM27, MM3, and MMFF94 force fields, which sometime overestimate, sometimes underestimate, the electrostatic interaction energy. The electrostatic component of the binding energies (directly related to the enthalpy of sublimation) of molecules in crystals, calculated based on the databank parameters, agree within 25−60 kJ/mol with the total binding energies evaluated ab initio at the Density Functional level of theory, even though the exchange−repulsion and dispersion terms have not been taken into account in the databank values.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp0379796

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Volkov, A., Li, X., Koritsanszky, T., & Coppens, P.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2004-04-17
Volume
108
Issue
19
Pages
4283-4300
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W1965341794
Cited by
178
References
2
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.