The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethanol Electrooxidation on a Carbon-Supported Pt Catalyst: Reaction Kinetics and Product Yields
Abstract
The ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) on a carbon-supported Pt nanoparticle catalyst was studied by cyclic voltammetry and potential-step measurements as a function of ethanol concentration and reaction temperature (23−60 °C), combining on-line mass spectrometric analysis of the reaction products and electrochemical current measurements. The effect of catalyst loading/electrode roughness was elucidated by comparison with a polycrystalline Pt electrode. Individual, absolute rates for CO 2 and acetaldehyde formation were determined via the doubly ionized carbon dioxide molecular ion at m/z = 22 and the CHO + fragment at m/z = 29, whereas acetic acid yields were calculated as the difference between the Faradaic current (charge) and the sum of the partial currents for oxidation to CO 2 and acetaldehyde, calculated from the calibrated mass spectrometric currents. Incomplete ethanol oxidation to acetaldehyde and acetic acid prevails over complete oxidation to CO 2 under all conditions, the dominant products being acetic acid at low (1 mM) and acetaldehyde at high (0.5 M) ethanol concentration or low catalyst loading/electrode roughness, i.e., on the smooth Pt electrode, whereas current efficiency and product yield for CO 2 formation is on the order of a few percent. The reaction orders for ethanol on Pt/Vulcan are 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 for CO 2, acetic acid, and acetaldehyde formation and 0.6 for the total Faradaic current, respectively. These trends are discussed in terms of increasing readsorption and subsequent oxidation of volatile, desorbing reaction intermediates with increasing catalyst loading/electrode roughness, considering that acetic acid oxidation is kinetically hindered at room temperature, and a rather low rate for C−C bond breaking under these conditions. The temperature dependence in this temperature range results in an apparent activation energy for the total reaction (Faradaic current) of 32 kJ/mol. The respective values for the partial reactions for CO 2, acetic acid and acetaldehyde formation are 20, 28, and 43 kJ/mol, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Characterization of High‐Surface‐Area Electrocatalysts Using a Rotating Disk Electrode Configuration
Schmidt, T. J., Gasteiger, H. A., Stäb, G. D., Urban, P. M., Kolb, D. M., & Behm, R. J. (1998) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1838642 · Cited by 1,131
Self-citation
Cited by
Huang, W., Ma, X., Wang, H., Feng, R., Zhou, J., Duchesne, P. N., Zhang, P., Chen, F., Han, N., Zhao, F., et al. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201703057 · Cited by 320
Self-citationWang, H., Jusys, Z., & Behm, R. J. (2006) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.034 · Cited by 318
Self-citationCarbon-neutral sustainable energy technology: Direct ethanol fuel cells
An, L., Zhao, T. S., & Li, Y. S. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.074 · Cited by 307
Gomes, J., Profeti, D., & Deiner, L. J. (2014) · ChemElectroChem · doi:10.1002/celc.201300060 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, H., Jusys, Z., & Behm, R. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-11-16
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 19413-19424
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2044908206
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.