Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 514

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Thiol Capping on the Exciton Luminescence and Decay Kinetics of CdTe and CdSe Quantum Dots

Open access
Wuister, Sander F., de Mello Donegá, Celso, Meijerink, Andries·2004·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

Highly luminescent CdSe and CdTe quantum dots (QDs) are prepared in a hot solvent of capping molecules (TOP/TOPO/HDA for CdSe and TOP/DDA for CdTe). The influence of exchange of the capping molecules with different types of thiol molecules (amino ethanethiol, (3-mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane, hexanethiol, 2-propenethiol, and 4-mercaptophenol) is investigated for both CdSe and CdTe QDs. A remarkable difference is observed: capping exchange with thiol molecules results in an increased luminescence efficiency for CdTe QDs but induces quenching of the excitonic emission of CdSe QDs. The striking difference between the two types of II-VI QDs is explained by the difference in the energy of the valence band top. The lower energetic position of the valence band for CdSe results in hole trapping of the photogenerated hole on the thiol molecule, thus quenching the luminescence. For CdTe the valence band is situated at higher energies with respect to the redox level of most thiols, thus inhibiting hole trapping and maintaining a high luminescence efficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp047078c

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wuister, S. F., de Mello Donegá, C., & Meijerink, A.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2004-10-16
Volume
108
Issue
45
Pages
17393-17397
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2096748753
Cited by
514
References
1
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.