Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Liquid Water from First Principles: Investigation of Different Sampling Approaches

Open access
Kuo, I-Feng W., Mundy, Christopher J., McGrath, Matthew J., Siepmann, J. Ilja, VandeVondele, Joost, Sprik, Michiel, Hutter, Jürg, Chen, Bin, Klein, Michael L., Mohamed, Fawzi, Krack, Matthias, Parrinello, Michele·2004·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

A series of first principles molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations were carried out for liquid water to investigate the reproducibility of different sampling approaches. These simulations include Car−Parrinello molecular dynamics simulations using the program cpmd with different values of the fictitious electron mass in the microcanonical and canonical ensembles, Born−Oppenheimer molecular dynamics using the programs cpmd and cp 2 k in the microcanonical ensemble, and Metropolis Monte Carlo using cp 2 k in the canonical ensemble. With the exception of one simulation for 128 water molecules, all other simulations were carried out for systems consisting of 64 molecules. Although the simulations yield somewhat fortuitous agreement in structural properties, analysis of other properties demonstrate that one should exercise caution when assuming the reproducibility of Car−Parrinello and Born−Oppenheimer molecular dynamics simulations for small system sizes in the microcanonical ensemble. In contrast, the molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations in the canonical ensemble appear to be more reliable. Furthermore, in the case of canonical Car−Parrinello molecular dynamics simulations the application of Nosé−Hoover chain thermostats allows the use of larger fictitious electron masses. For the Becke−Lee−Yang−Parr exchange and correlation energy functionals and norm-conserving Troullier−Martins or Goedecker−Teter−Hutter pseudopotentials, these simulations at a fixed density of 1.0 g/cm 3 and a temperature close to 315 K point to an overstructured liquid with a height of the first peak in the oxygen−oxygen radial distribution function of about 3.0, an underestimated value of the classical constant-volume heat capacity of about 70 J/(mol K), and an underestimated self-diffusion constant of about 0.04 Å 2 /ps.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp047788i

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kuo, I.-F. W., Mundy, C. J., McGrath, M. J., Siepmann, J. I., VandeVondele, J., Sprik, M., Hutter, J., Chen, B., Klein, M. L., Mohamed, F., Krack, M., & Parrinello, M.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2004-08-01
Volume
108
Issue
34
Pages
12990-12998
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2748806820
Cited by
338
References
0
FWCI
15.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.