The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Urea-Based Hydrothermally Derived Homogeneous Nanostructured Ce1-xZrxO2 (x = 0−0.8) Solid Solutions: A Strong Correlation between Oxygen Storage Capacity and Lattice Strain
Abstract
Ce 1 - x Zr x O 2 ( x = 0−0.8) nanoparticulate powders were prepared via a mild urea hydrolysis based hydrothermal method through homogeneous nucleation at 413 K followed by calcination at 773 or 1173 K. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) measurements testify to the good stoichiometric homogeneity of Ce and Zr cations in the as-obtained Ce 1 - x Zr x O 2 products. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and ultraviolet−visible (UV−vis) spectra exhibit that both surface and bulk ratios of Ce 3+ to Ce 4+ for the as-prepared Ce 1 - x Zr x O 2 nanocrystals increased with the zirconium content x . Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns and Raman spectra demonstrate that the present Ce 1 - x Zr x O 2 samples were single-phase solid solutions with good structural homogeneity and high thermal stability up to 1273 K, and those with x = 0.4−0.6 retained a pseudocubic structure ( t ‘ ‘ phase) due to the small crystallite size effect. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs reveal that the as-prepared CeO 2 −ZrO 2 nanocrystals were highly crystallized with narrow size distribution. Nitrogen adsorption measurements show that the BET specific surface areas of the Ce 1 - x Zr x O 2 powders were improved by the incorporation of ZrO 2 . The PXRD data and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images illuminate that the as-prepared and as-calcined Ce 1 - x Zr x O 2 ( x = 0.4−0.6) powders kept a rather high strain level in the crystal lattice. The lattice strains in our Ce 1 - x Zr x O 2 catalysts show a linear relationship with their oxygen storage capacity (OSC) values. This linear correlation is explained on the basis of qualitative structural and defective analysis, and might find use in the screening and design of better-performing three-way catalysts (TWCs). The highest CO-OSC values of the studied CeO 2 −ZrO 2 catalysts appeared for Ce 0.5 Zr 0.5 O 2 (543 μmol of CO g -1 at 773 K and 628 μmol of CO g -1 at 973 K).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Liu, B., Li, C., Zhang, G., Yao, X., Chuang, S. S. C., & Li, Z. (2018) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b00415 · Cited by 668
Morphology effect of Ru/CeO2 catalysts for the catalytic combustion of chlorobenzene
Huang, H., Dai, Q., & Wang, X. (2014) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.01.062 · Cited by 555
Ni 3 N–CeO 2 Heterostructure Bifunctional Catalysts for Electrochemical Water Splitting
Ding, X., Jiang, R., Wu, J., Xing, M., Qiao, Z., Zeng, X., Wang, S., & Cao, D. (2023) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202306786 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Si, R., Zhang, Y.-W., Li, S.-J., Lin, B.-X., & Yan, C.-H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-07-22
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 12481-12488
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2027071460
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.