The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Density Functional Study of the Chemical Differences between Type I and Type II MoS2-Based Structures in Hydrotreating Catalysts
Abstract
Density functional theory is used to investigate the origin of the activity differences between Type I and Type II MoS2-based structures in hydrotreating catalysts. It is well known that the Type II structures, where only weak interactions with the support exist, have a higher catalytic activity than Type I structures, where Mo-O linkages to the alumina are present. The present results show that the differences in activities for MoS2 and Co-Mo-S structures can be attributed to the electronic and bonding differences introduced by the bridging O bonds. We find that the Mo-O linkages are most probably located on the (1010) S edge. The presence of oxygen linkages increases the energy required to form sulfur vacancies significantly so that almost no vacancies can be formed at these and neighboring sites. In this way, the reactivity of the S edge is reduced. In addition, the studies also show that the linkages introduce changes in the one-dimensional metallic-like brim states. Furthermore, the presence of oxygen linkages also changes the energetics of hydrogen adsorption, which becomes less exothermic on sulfur sites directly above linkages and more exothermic on sulfur sites adjacent to linkages. The present results explain previously observed differences in Type I-Type II transition temperatures for Co-Mo-S structures with different Co contents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laursen, A. B., Kegnæs, S., Dahl, S., & Chorkendorff, I. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee02618j · Cited by 1,348
Yan, Y., Xia, B., Xu, Z., & Wang, X. (2014) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs500070x · Cited by 868
Tsai, C., Chan, K., Abild-Pedersen, F., & Nørskov, J. K. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp01237b · Cited by 494
Self-citationThe role of Co–Mo–S type structures in hydrotreating catalysts
Topsøe, H. (2007) · Applied Catalysis A: General · doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2007.01.002 · Cited by 340
Self-citationBesenbacher, F., Brorson, M., Clausen, B. S., Helveg, S., Hinnemann, B., Kibsgaard, J., Lauritsen, J. V., Moses, P. G., Nørskov, J. K., & Topsøe, H. (2008) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2007.08.009 · Cited by 302
Self-citationCatalysis Applications of Size-Selected Cluster Deposition
Vajda, S., & White, M. G. (2015) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b01816 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Hinnemann, B., Nørskov, J. K., & Topsøe, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-08-04
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2245-2253
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2048204623
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.