Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Databases for Transition Element Bonding: Metal−Metal Bond Energies and Bond Lengths and Their Use To Test Hybrid, Hybrid Meta, and Meta Density Functionals and Generalized Gradient Approximations

Schultz, Nathan E., Zhao, Yan, Truhlar, Donald G.·2005·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

We propose a data set of bond lengths for 8 selected transition metal dimers (Ag(2), Cr(2), Cu(2), CuAg, Mo(2), Ni(2), V(2), and Zr(2)) and another data set containing their atomization energies and the atomization energy of ZrV, and we use these for testing density functional theory. The molecules chosen for the test sets were selected on the basis of the expected reliability of the data and their ability to constitute a diverse and representative set of transition element bond types while the data sets are kept small enough to allow for efficient testing of a large number of computational methods against a very reliable subset of experimental data. In this paper we test 42 different functionals: 2 local spin density approximation (LSDA) functionals, 12 generalized gradient approximation (GGA) methods, 13 hybrid GGAs, 7 meta GGA methods, and 8 hybrid meta GGAs. We find that GGA density functionals are more accurate for the atomization energies of pure transition metal systems than are their meta, hybrid, or hybrid meta analogues. We find that the errors for atomization energies and bond lengths are not as large if we limit ourselves to dimers with small amounts of multireference character. We also demonstrate the effects of increasing the fraction of Hartree-Fock exchange in multireference systems by computing the potential energy curve for Cr(2) and Mo(2) with several functionals. We also find that BLYP is the most accurate functional for bond energies and is reasonably accurate for bond lengths. The methods that work well for transition metal bonds are found to be quite different from those that work well for organic and other main group chemistry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp0504468

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Schultz, N. E., Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2005-04-26
Volume
109
Issue
19
Pages
4388-4403
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W2052043507
Cited by
218
References
0
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Databases for Transition Element Bonding: Metal−Metal Bond Energies and Bond Lengths and Their Use To Test Hybrid, Hybrid Meta, and Meta Density Functionals and Generalized Gradient Approximations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp0504468
The paper
Schultz, N. E., Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2005). Databases for Transition Element Bonding: Metal−Metal Bond Energies and Bond Lengths and Their Use To Test Hybrid, Hybrid Meta, and Meta Density Functionals and Generalized Gradient Approximations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0504468

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.