The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Databases for Transition Element Bonding: Metal−Metal Bond Energies and Bond Lengths and Their Use To Test Hybrid, Hybrid Meta, and Meta Density Functionals and Generalized Gradient Approximations
Abstract
We propose a data set of bond lengths for 8 selected transition metal dimers (Ag(2), Cr(2), Cu(2), CuAg, Mo(2), Ni(2), V(2), and Zr(2)) and another data set containing their atomization energies and the atomization energy of ZrV, and we use these for testing density functional theory. The molecules chosen for the test sets were selected on the basis of the expected reliability of the data and their ability to constitute a diverse and representative set of transition element bond types while the data sets are kept small enough to allow for efficient testing of a large number of computational methods against a very reliable subset of experimental data. In this paper we test 42 different functionals: 2 local spin density approximation (LSDA) functionals, 12 generalized gradient approximation (GGA) methods, 13 hybrid GGAs, 7 meta GGA methods, and 8 hybrid meta GGAs. We find that GGA density functionals are more accurate for the atomization energies of pure transition metal systems than are their meta, hybrid, or hybrid meta analogues. We find that the errors for atomization energies and bond lengths are not as large if we limit ourselves to dimers with small amounts of multireference character. We also demonstrate the effects of increasing the fraction of Hartree-Fock exchange in multireference systems by computing the potential energy curve for Cr(2) and Mo(2) with several functionals. We also find that BLYP is the most accurate functional for bond energies and is reasonably accurate for bond lengths. The methods that work well for transition metal bonds are found to be quite different from those that work well for organic and other main group chemistry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2008) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x · Cited by 30,302
Self-citationAn Evaluation of Harmonic Vibrational Frequency Scale Factors
Merrick, J. P., Moran, D., & Radom, L. (2007) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp073974n · Cited by 2,735
Alecu, I. M., Zheng, J., Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct100326h · Cited by 1,667
Self-citationDensity functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry
Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2009) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b907148b · Cited by 1,648
Self-citationPeverati, R., & Truhlar, D. G. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0476 · Cited by 734
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schultz, N. E., Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-04-26
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4388-4403
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2052043507
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Databases for Transition Element Bonding: Metal−Metal Bond Energies and Bond Lengths and Their Use To Test Hybrid, Hybrid Meta, and Meta Density Functionals and Generalized Gradient Approximations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp0504468
- The paper
- Schultz, N. E., Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2005). Databases for Transition Element Bonding: Metal−Metal Bond Energies and Bond Lengths and Their Use To Test Hybrid, Hybrid Meta, and Meta Density Functionals and Generalized Gradient Approximations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0504468
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.