Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 468

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigation of the Kinetics of a TiO2 Photoelectrocatalytic Reaction Involving Charge Transfer and Recombination through Surface States by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

Leng, W. H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, J. Q., Cao, C. N.·2005·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
DOI 10.1021/jp051821z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) mathematical model of TiO2 photoelectrocatalytic (PEC) reactions involving charge transfer and recombination through surface states was developed. The model was used to study the kinetics of photoelectrocatalytic decomposition of salicylic acid. The model simulation results show that the appearance of two distinguishable semicircles in the EIS response depends on the charging of surface state and light intensity. The experimental results demonstrated that similar phenomena to the theoretical simulation results. The model provides a way to obtain the rate constants for the photoelectrochemical reactions of surface states mediating charge transfer and recombination. The applied potential changes not only the recombination rate constant but also the charge-transfer rate constant. Moreover, the experimental EIS results here and those previous published on PEC degradation reactions can be explained by the present model satisfactorily. The relevance of surface states was discussed briefly. The results demonstrated that EIS is a powerful tool for studying the kinetics of PEC decomposition of organic pollutants on TiO2 electrodes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp051821z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Hidaka H., 1995, J. Phys. Chem., 99, 8244, 10.1021/j100020a056 · doi:10.1021/j100020a056
  2. Vinodgopal K., 1993, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 9040, 10.1021/j100137a033 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Vinodgopal K., 1993, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 6797, 10.1021/j100137a033 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kesselman J. M., 1994, J. Phys. Chem., 98, 13385, 10.1021/j100101a044 · DOI
  5. Leng W. H., 2003, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 206, 239, 10.1016/S1381-1169(03)00373-X · doi:10.1016/s1381-1169(03)00373-x
  6. Calvo M. E., 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4132, 10.1021/es010613r · DOI
  7. Waldner G., 2003, Chemosphere, 50, 989, 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00612-4 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Jiang-Lin C., 2004, Acta Phys. Chin. Sin., 20, 735, 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20040714 · doi:10.3866/pku.whxb20040714
  9. Hagfeldt A., 1993, Chem. Rev., 93, 671, 10.1021/cr00018a003 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Lewis N. S., 1998, J. Phys. Chem. B, 102, 4843, 10.1021/jp9803586 · doi:10.1021/jp9803586
  11. Nozik A. J., 1996, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 13061, 10.1021/jp953720e · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lewis N. S., 1990, Acc. Chem. Res., 23, 176, 10.1021/ar00174a002 · DOI
  13. Salvador P., 2001, J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 6182, 10.1021/jp0033869 · DOI
  14. Bisquert J., 2004, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126, 13550, 10.1021/ja047311k · doi:10.1021/ja047311k
  15. Ahmed S., 2003, J. Phys. Chem. B, 107, 5892, 10.1021/jp030312z · doi:10.1021/jp030312z
  16. Jin Z. Z., 2000, J. Phys. Chem. B, 104, 7239
  17. Nishida M., 1980, J. Appl. Phys., 51, 1669, 10.1063/1.327774 · doi:10.1063/1.327774
  18. Hagfeldt A., 1996, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 8045, 10.1021/jp9518567 · DOI
  19. Liao K. H., 1995, J. Phys. Chem., 99, 4569, 10.1021/j100013a031 · doi:10.1021/j100013a031
  20. Mandelbaum P. M., 1999, J. Phys. Chem. B, 103, 5505, 10.1021/jp984812h · doi:10.1021/jp984812h
  21. De Jonh P. E., 1997, J. Phys. Chem. B, 101, 2716, 10.1021/jp962226n · doi:10.1021/jp962226n
  22. Peter L. M., 1990, Chem. Rev., 90, 753, 10.1021/cr00103a005 · doi:10.1021/cr00103a005
  23. Semenikhin O. A., 1999, Languir, 15, 3731, 10.1021/la981437b · doi:10.1021/la981437b
  24. Oekermann T., 2001, J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 9524, 10.1021/jp0107661 · doi:10.1021/jp0107661
  25. Peat R., 1987, J. Electroanal. Chem., 228, 351, 10.1016/0022-0728(87)80117-1 · doi:10.1016/0022-0728(87)80117-1
  26. Cass M. J., 2003, J. Phys. Chem. B, 107, 5857, 10.1021/jp030088d · doi:10.1021/jp030088d
  27. Ponomarev E. A., 1995, J. Electroanal. Chem., 397, 45, 10.1016/0022-0728(95)04148-9 · doi:10.1016/0022-0728(95)04148-9
  28. Ponomarev E. A., 1995, J. Electroanal. Chem., 396, 219, 10.1016/0022-0728(95)04115-5 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Peter L. M., 1997, J. Electroanal. Chem., 427, 79, 10.1016/S0022-0728(96)05033-4 · doi:10.1016/s0022-0728(96)05033-4
  30. Schefold J., 1995, J. Electrochem. Soc., 142, 850, 10.1149/1.2048547 · doi:10.1149/1.2048547
  31. Bisquert J., 2000, J. Phys. Chem. B, 104, 2287, 10.1021/jp993148h · DOI · Paper page
  32. Liu H., 2000, J. Phys. Chem. A, 104, 7016, 10.1021/jp000171q · doi:10.1021/jp000171q
  33. Leng W. H., 2001, Chin. Chem. Lett., 12, 1019
  34. Liu H., 2003, J. Phys. Chem. B, 107, 8988, 10.1021/jp034113r · doi:10.1021/jp034113r
  35. Turchi C. S., 1990, J. Catal., 122, 178, 10.1016/0021-9517(90)90269-P · DOI · Paper page
  36. Fermin D. J., 1999, J. Electroanal. Chem., 473, 192, 10.1016/S0022-0728(99)00109-6 · DOI
  37. Hens Z., 1999, J. Phys. Chem. B, 103, 122, 10.1021/jp982766f · doi:10.1021/jp982766f
  38. Cao, C. N.; Zhang, J. Q.An Introduction to Electrochemical ImpedanceSpectroscopy; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2002; pp 76−83.
  39. Moser J., 1991, Langmuir, 7, 3012, 10.1021/la00060a018 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Tunesi S., 1991, J. Phys. Chem., 95, 3399, 10.1021/j100161a078 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Weisz A. D., 2002, Catal. Today, 76, 103, 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00210-9 · doi:10.1016/s0920-5861(02)00210-9
  42. Mandelbaum P., 1999, Solar Energy, 65, 75, 10.1016/S0038-092X(98)00090-5 · DOI
  43. Regazzoni A. E., 1998, Langmuir, 14, 868, 10.1021/la970665n · DOI
  44. Morand R., 2002, Chem. Phys. Lett., 364, 244, 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01331-3 · doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(02)01331-3
  45. Calvo M. E., 2002, Catal. Today, 76, 133, 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00213-4 · doi:10.1016/s0920-5861(02)00213-4
  46. Oskam G., 1996, J. Electrochem. Soc., 143, 2531, 10.1149/1.1837043 · doi:10.1149/1.1837043
  47. Oskam G., 1996, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 1521, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1521 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.1521
  48. Cunningham J., 1999, Catal. Today, 53, 145, 10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00109-1 · DOI
  49. Kratochvilová K., 1995, Electrochim. Acta, 40, 2603, 10.1016/0013-4686(95)00244-9 · doi:10.1016/0013-4686(95)00244-9
  50. Salvador P., 1985, J. Phys. Chem., 89, 3863, 10.1021/j100264a019 · DOI
  51. Ferrer I. J., 1986, J. Phys. Chem., 90, 2805, 10.1021/j100404a004 · doi:10.1021/j100404a004
  52. Peter L. M., 1984, J. Electroanal. Chem., 165, 29, 10.1016/S0022-0728(84)80084-4 · doi:10.1016/s0022-0728(84)80084-4
  53. Brown G. T., 1985, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107, 6446, 10.1021/ja00309a003 · doi:10.1021/ja00309a003
  54. Bahnemann D., 1984, J. Phys. Chem., 88, 709, 10.1021/j150648a018 · DOI

Cited by

See all 468

Metadata

Authors
Leng, W. H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, J. Q., & Cao, C. N.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2005-07-16
Volume
109
Issue
31
Pages
15008-15023
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
DOI
10.1021/jp051821z
OpenAlex
W2051758448
Cited by
468
References
1
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of the Kinetics of a TiO2 Photoelectrocatalytic Reaction Involving Charge Transfer and Recombination through Surface States by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp051821z
The paper
Leng, W. H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, J. Q., & Cao, C. N. (2005). Investigation of the Kinetics of a TiO2 Photoelectrocatalytic Reaction Involving Charge Transfer and Recombination through Surface States by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp051821z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.