The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On Possible Pitfalls in ab Initio Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics Minimization Approaches for Studies of Enzymatic Reactions
Open accessAbstract
Reliable studies of enzymatic reactions by combined quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) approaches, with an ab initio description of the quantum region, presents a major challenge to computational chemists. The main problem is the need for a very large computer time for the evaluation of the QM energy, which in turn makes it extremely challenging to perform proper configurational sampling. A seemingly reasonable alternative is to perform energy minimization studies of the type used in gas-phase ab initio studies. However, it is hard to see why such an approach should give reliable results in protein active sites. To examine the problems with energy minimization QM/MM approaches, we chose the hypothetical reaction of a metaphosphate ion with water in the Ras.GAP complex. This hypothetical reaction served as a simple benchmark reaction. The possible problems with the QM/MM minimization were explored by generating several protein configurations from long MD simulations and using energy minimization and scanning of the reaction coordinates to evaluate the corresponding potential energy surfaces of the reaction for each of these different protein configurations. Comparing these potential energy surfaces, we found major variations of the corresponding minima. Furthermore, the reaction energies and activation energies also varied significantly even for similar protein configurations. The specific coordination of a magnesium ion, present in the active center of the protein complex, turned out to influence the energetics of the reaction in a major way, where a direct coordination to the reactant leads to an increase of the activation energy by 17 kcal/mol. Apparently, using energy minimization to generate potential surfaces for an enzymatic reaction, while starting from a single protein structure, could lead to major errors in calculations of activation free energies and binding free energies. Thus we believe that extensive samplings of the configurational space of the protein are essential for meaningful determination of the energetics of enzymatic reactions. The possible relevance of our conclusion with regard to a recent study of the RasGAP reaction is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ras-RasGAP Complex: Structural Basis for GTPase Activation and Its Loss in Oncogenic Ras Mutants
Scheffzek, K., Ahmadian, M. R., Kabsch, W., Wiesmüller, L., Lautwein, A., Schmitz, F., & Wittinghofer, A. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5324.333 · Cited by 1,543
Cited by
QM/MM Methods for Biomolecular Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200802019 · Cited by 2,684
Brunk, E., & Rothlisberger, U. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500628b · Cited by 494
QM/MM Methods for Biological Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2006) · Topics in Current Chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2006_084 · Cited by 428
Modeling Enzymatic Reactions Involving Transition Metals
Siegbahn, P. E. M., & Borowski, T. (2006) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar050123u · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Klähn, M., Braun-Sand, S., Rosta, E., & Warshel, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-07-21
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 15645-15650
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W119538510
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.