The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aspect Ratio Dependence of the Enhanced Fluorescence Intensity of Gold Nanorods: Experimental and Simulation Study
Abstract
Experimental observations and theoretical treatments are carried out for the band shape and relative intensity of the emission from gold nanorods of various aspect ratios in the range between 2.25 (1.5 theory) and 6.0 (9 theory). The calculation of the fluorescence spectra requires knowledge of the nanorod size distribution, the enhancement factors, and the shape of the unenhanced fluorescence spectrum. The size distribution is determined from the fit of the observed absorption spectrum for each value of aspect ratio studied to the theoretical model of Gans. The theory by Boyd and Shen is used for calculating the enhancement of the fluorescence spectrum of the previously observed weak emission of bulk gold, which originates from the interband transition. This is carried out for nanorods of different aspect ratios. To compare theory to the observed nanorod fluorescence spectra, which suffer from self-absorption, the calculated nanorod fluorescence spectra are corrected for this effect using the observed absorption spectra. The comparison between the observed and the calculated fluorescence band shapes is found to be good. The calculated changes in the relative intensities upon changing the aspect ratios are found to be much greater than that observed. This is due to the fact that for the observed emission of all the nanorods studied nonradiative processes dominate the relaxation mechanism of the excited state, a fact that was not included in the theoretical treatments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optical Constants of the Noble Metals
Johnson, P. B., & Christy, R. W. (1972) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.6.4370 · Cited by 20,094
Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen
Mie, G. (1908) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19083300302 · Cited by 11,537
Cited by
Eustis, S., & El-Sayed, M. A. (2006) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b514191e · Cited by 3,143
Self-citationGold Nanorods: From Synthesis and Properties to Biological and Biomedical Applications
Huang, X., Neretina, S., & El‐Sayed, M. A. (2009) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200802789 · Cited by 1,921
Self-citationHuang, X., Jain, P. K., El-Sayed, I. H., & El-Sayed, M. A. (2007) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/17435889.2.5.681 · Cited by 1,503
Self-citationPEG-modified gold nanorods with a stealth character for in vivo applications
Niidome, T., Yamagata, M., Okamoto, Y., Akiyama, Y., Takahashi, H., Kawano, T., Katayama, Y., & Niidome, Y. (2006) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.06.017 · Cited by 1,200
Gold Nanomaterials at Work in Biomedicine
Yang, X., Yang, M., Pang, B., Vara, M., & Xia, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00193 · Cited by 1,162
Pelton, M., Aizpurua, J., & Bryant, G. (2008) · Laser & Photonics Reviews · doi:10.1002/lpor.200810003 · Cited by 655
Metadata
- Authors
- Eustis, S., & El-Sayed, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-08-09
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 16350-16356
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W1972861794
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.