The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Are Viscosities Lower for Ionic Liquids with −CH2Si(CH3)3 vs −CH2C(CH3)3 Substitutions on the Imidazolium Cations?
Abstract
We have prepared novel room temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) with trimethylsilylmethyl (TMSiM)-substituted imidazolium cations and compared the properties of these liquids with those for which the TMSiM group is replaced by the analogous neopentyl group. The ionic liquids are prepared with both tetrafluoroborate (BF(4)(-)) and bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (NTf(2)(-)) anions paired with the imidazolium cations. At 22 degrees C, the TMSiM-substituted imidazolium ILs have shear viscosities that are reduced by a factor of 1.6 and 7.4 relative to the alkylimidazolium ILs for the NTf(2)(-) and BF(4)(-) anions, respectively. To understand the effect of silicon substitution on the viscosity, the charge densities have been calculated by using density functional theory electronic structure calculations. The ultrafast intermolecular, vibrational, and orientational dynamics of these RTILs have been measured by using femtosecond optical heterodyne-detected Raman-induced Kerr effect spectroscopy (OHD-RIKES). The intermolecular dynamical spectrum provides an estimate of the strength of interactions between the ions in the RTILs, and provides a qualitative explanation for the observed reduction in viscosity for the silicon-substituted RTILs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
H. Davis, J. (2004) · Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1246/cl.2004.1072 · Cited by 1,053
Cited by
An overview of CO2 capture technologies
MacDowell, N., Florin, N., Buchard, A., Hallett, J., Galindo, A., Jackson, G., Adjiman, C. S., Williams, C. K., Shah, N., & Fennell, P. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c004106h · Cited by 1,636
Araque, J. C., Hettige, J. J., & Margulis, C. J. (2015) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05506 · Cited by 320
Turton, D. A., Hunger, J., Stoppa, A., Hefter, G., Thoman, A., Walther, M., Buchner, R., & Wynne, K. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja903315v · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Shirota, H., & Castner, E. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-10-20
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 21576-21585
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2058817590
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Are Viscosities Lower for Ionic Liquids with −CH2Si(CH3)3 vs −CH2C(CH3)3 Substitutions on the Imidazolium Cations? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp053930j
- The paper
- Shirota, H., & Castner, E. W. (2005). Why Are Viscosities Lower for Ionic Liquids with −CH2Si(CH3)3 vs −CH2C(CH3)3 Substitutions on the Imidazolium Cations? The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp053930j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.