The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Catalysis: Understanding Ammonia Synthesis from First-Principles Calculations
Open accessAbstract
Here, we give a full account of a large collaborative effort toward an atomic-scale understanding of modern industrial ammonia production over ruthenium catalysts. We show that overall rates of ammonia production can be determined by applying various levels of theory (including transition state theory with or without tunneling corrections, and quantum dynamics) to a range of relevant elementary reaction steps, such as N(2) dissociation, H(2) dissociation, and hydrogenation of the intermediate reactants. A complete kinetic model based on the most relevant elementary steps can be established for any given point along an industrial reactor, and the kinetic results can be integrated over the catalyst bed to determine the industrial reactor yield. We find that, given the present uncertainties, the rate of ammonia production is well-determined directly from our atomic-scale calculations. Furthermore, our studies provide new insight into several related fields, for instance, gas-phase and electrochemical ammonia synthesis. The success of predicting the outcome of a catalytic reaction from first-principles calculations supports our point of view that, in the future, theory will be a fully integrated tool in the search for the next generation of catalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode
Nørskov, J. K., Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A., Lindqvist, L., Kitchin, J. R., Bligaard, T., & Jónsson, H. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp047349j · Cited by 13,153
Self-citationManthe, U., Meyer, H.-D., & Cederbaum, L. S. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.463007 · Cited by 998
Self-citationSierka, M., & Sauer, J. (2001) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp004081x · Cited by 149
Cited by
Density functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry
Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2009) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b907148b · Cited by 1,648
A theoretical evaluation of possible transition metal electro-catalysts for N2reduction
Skúlason, E., Bligaard, T., Gudmundsdóttir, S., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J., Abild-Pedersen, F., Vegge, T., Jónsson, H., & Nørskov, J. K. (2012) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c1cp22271f · Cited by 1,609
Self-citationMontoya, J. H., Tsai, C., Vojvodic, A., & Nørskov, J. K. (2015) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201500322 · Cited by 1,384
Self-citationSchlögl, R. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201410738 · Cited by 1,043
Enhancing Electrocatalytic Water Splitting by Strain Engineering
You, B., Tang, M. T., Tsai, C., Abild‐Pedersen, F., Zheng, X., & Li, H. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201807001 · Cited by 793
Metadata
- Authors
- Hellman, A., Baerends, E. J., Biczysko, M., Bligaard, T., Christensen, C. H., Clary, D. C., Dahl, S., van Harrevelt, R., Honkala, K., Jonsson, H., Kroes, G. J., Luppi, M., Manthe, U., Nørskov, J. K., Olsen, R. A., Rossmeisl, J., Skúlason, E., Tautermann, C. S., Varandas, A. J. C., & Vincent, J. K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 17719-17735
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W1965920240
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.