Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting Catalysis: Understanding Ammonia Synthesis from First-Principles Calculations

Open access
Hellman, A., Baerends, E. J., Biczysko, M., Bligaard, T., Christensen, C. H., Clary, D. C., Dahl, S., van Harrevelt, R., Honkala, K., Jonsson, H., Kroes, G. J., Luppi, M., Manthe, U., Nørskov, J. K., Olsen, R. A., Rossmeisl, J., Skúlason, E., Tautermann, C. S., Varandas, A. J. C., Vincent, J. K.·2006·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

Here, we give a full account of a large collaborative effort toward an atomic-scale understanding of modern industrial ammonia production over ruthenium catalysts. We show that overall rates of ammonia production can be determined by applying various levels of theory (including transition state theory with or without tunneling corrections, and quantum dynamics) to a range of relevant elementary reaction steps, such as N(2) dissociation, H(2) dissociation, and hydrogenation of the intermediate reactants. A complete kinetic model based on the most relevant elementary steps can be established for any given point along an industrial reactor, and the kinetic results can be integrated over the catalyst bed to determine the industrial reactor yield. We find that, given the present uncertainties, the rate of ammonia production is well-determined directly from our atomic-scale calculations. Furthermore, our studies provide new insight into several related fields, for instance, gas-phase and electrochemical ammonia synthesis. The success of predicting the outcome of a catalytic reaction from first-principles calculations supports our point of view that, in the future, theory will be a fully integrated tool in the search for the next generation of catalysts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp056982h

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Hellman, A., Baerends, E. J., Biczysko, M., Bligaard, T., Christensen, C. H., Clary, D. C., Dahl, S., van Harrevelt, R., Honkala, K., Jonsson, H., Kroes, G. J., Luppi, M., Manthe, U., Nørskov, J. K., Olsen, R. A., Rossmeisl, J., Skúlason, E., Tautermann, C. S., Varandas, A. J. C., & Vincent, J. K.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2006-09-01
Volume
110
Issue
36
Pages
17719-17735
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W1965920240
Cited by
219
References
3
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.