The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysts Prepared from Acetonitrile Pyrolysis over Alumina-Supported Metal Particles
Abstract
Noble-metal-free active catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in an acidic environment were prepared from the pyrolysis of acetonitrile at 900 degrees C over alumina and metal-doped alumina. This work includes analyses of the nitrogen-doped carbon preparation process, characterization of the carbon materials formed, and activity testing for the ORR. The nitrogen-containing carbon nanostructures that formed during the pyrolysis of acetonitrile could be purified by washing the product with hydrofluoric acid. A wide range of techniques were used to characterize the solid carbon products of the acetonitrile decomposition. While the samples have many similar physical properties, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy showed evidence that differences in the nanostructure and surface functional groups of the samples are likely to account for observed differences in oxygen reduction activity. The most active catalysts were prepared over alumina impregnated with up to 2 wt % Fe, although the catalysts that were prepared by acetonitrile pyrolysis over alumina with no metal doping still had significant activity. In comparison to a 20 wt % platinum on Vulcan carbon catalyst, the most active samples only have an additional 100 mV overpotential. The selectivity of the catalysts for complete oxygen reduction to water followed a trend similar to activity. The best selectivity to water versus peroxide obtained was 99%, or equivalently, an n of 3.98 (i.e., 3.98 electrons transferred out of a maximum of 4 electrons per mole of oxygen that is reduced), as determined by rotating ring-disk electrode testing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of nitrogen functionalities in carbonaceous materials during pyrolysis
Pels, J. R., Kapteijn, F., Moulijn, J. A., Zhu, Q., & Thomas, K. M. (1995) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/0008-6223(95)00154-6 · Cited by 2,041
Cited by
Scientific Aspects of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Durability and Degradation
Borup, R., Meyers, J., Pivovar, B., Kim, Y. S., Mukundan, R., Garland, N., Myers, D., Wilson, M., Garzon, F., Wood, D., et al. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050182l · Cited by 3,402
Recent advances in catalysts for direct methanol fuel cells
Zhao, X., Yin, M., Ma, L., Liang, L., Liu, C., Liao, J., Lu, T., & Xing, W. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c1ee01307f · Cited by 939
Shao, Y., Sui, J., Yin, G., & Gao, Y. (2008) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.09.047 · Cited by 763
Sharifi, T., Hu, G., Jia, X., & Wågberg, T. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn302906r · Cited by 593
Carbon as catalyst and support for electrochemical energy conversion
Trogadas, P., Fuller, T. F., & Strasser, P. (2014) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2014.04.005 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Matter, P. H., Wang, E., Arias, M., Biddinger, E. J., & Ozkan, U. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-08-25
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 18374-18384
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2051089436
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.