The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Simulation of Carbon Dioxide/Methane/Hydrogen Mixture Adsorption in Metal−Organic Frameworks
Abstract
This work performs a systematic computational study toward a molecular understanding of the separation characteristics of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), for which the purification of synthetic gas by two representative MOFs, MOF-5 and Cu-BTC, is adopted as an example. The simulations show that both geometry and pore size affect largely the separation efficiency, complex selectivity behaviors with different steps can occur in MOFs, and the electrostatic interactions that exist can enhance greatly the separation efficiency of gas mixtures composed of components with different chemistries. Furthermore, the macroscopic separation behaviors of the MOF materials are elucidated at a molecular level to give insight into the underlying mechanisms. The findings as well as the molecular-level elucidations provide useful microscopic information toward a complete understanding of the separation characteristics of MOFs that may lead to general design strategies for synthesizing new MOFs with tailored properties, as well as guiding their practical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations
Li, J.-R., Sculley, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200190s · Cited by 6,323
Han, S. S., Mendoza-Cortés, J. L., & Goddard III, W. A. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b802430h · Cited by 594
Adsorption of CO2, CH4, and N2 on Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks: Experiments and Simulations
Pérez‐Pellitero, J., Amrouche, H., Siperstein, F. R., Pirngruber, G., Nieto‐Draghi, C., Chaplais, G., Simon‐Masseron, A., Bazer‐Bachi, D., Peralta, D., & Bats, N. (2010) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.200902144 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Q., & Zhong, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-08-19
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 17776-17783
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W1987736265
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.