Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

DFT Description on Electronic Structure and Optical Absorption Properties of Anionic S-Doped Anatase TiO2

Tian, Liu·2006·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

Plane-wave-based pseudopotential density functional theory (DFT) calculations are used to characterize the doping effect of S substituting for O in anatase TiO(2). Through band structure calculation, a direct band gap is predicted in TiO(2)(-)(x)S(x). Electronic structure analysis shows that the doping S could substantially lower the band gap of TiO(2) by the presence of an impurity state of S 3p on the upper edge of the valence band. Excitations from the impurity state of S 3p to the conduction band may be responsible for the red shift of the absorption edge observed in the S-doped TiO(2). The band gap lowering and red shift of the absorption edge are found to increase as the sulfur concentration increases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp0635462

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Tian, & Liu
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2006-08-22
Volume
110
Issue
36
Pages
17866-17871
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W1971675260
Cited by
199
References
0
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.